Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-06-18 Thread Martin Schulze
martin f krafft wrote: 3. In § 10 Abs. 8 it is stated that the minutes of the members' meetings are to be made publicly available. Yet, the last set of minutes linked online² is from 2006. § 10 Abs. 2 states that such a meeting must take place once every two years. Where can I

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-06-03 Thread martin f krafft
Dear Joey, thanks for your replies! ffis e.V. supports Free Software in general, a small number of Free Software projects in particular, and maintains close relationship to the projects they are supporting, be it via an auditor, project leader or via a contact person within the project.

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-05-31 Thread Martin Schulze
martin f krafft wrote: I have one question about Joey's responses regarding FFIS: * The organization has decision-making processes that explicitely delegate decisions on Debian assets to the Debian Project Leader true. For completeness: where is this explicitly defined?

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-04-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org [2014-03-11 11:58 +0100]: I'm forwarding their answers below; please use the next two weeks to ask follow-up questions. *Almost* in time, at least if 2 == 4, and clearly, there are cases when that is true. ;) I have one question about Joey's

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-03-25 Thread Martin Schulze
Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Joey, On 11/03/14 at 11:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: == The organization should be reliable, sustainable, and reactive == * The organization has several people sharing the role of treasurer in order to react quickly to requests in all circumstances

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-03-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Joey, On 11/03/14 at 11:58 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: == The organization should be reliable, sustainable, and reactive == * The organization has several people sharing the role of treasurer in order to react quickly to requests in all circumstances true. I was actually

Prospective Trusted Organizations - FFIS

2014-03-11 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
To: Lucas Nussbaum lea...@debian.org Cc: i...@ffis.de, audi...@debian.org Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 16:16:09 +0100 Subject: Re: Evaluation criteria for (prospective) Trusted Organizations -- FFIS Message-ID: 20140308151609.gx...@finlandia.home.infodrom.org Debian Trusted Organizations

Prospective Trusted Organizations - (FFIS), Debian France

2014-03-01 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Our constitution (5.1.11 and 9) describes a process to manage the list of Trusted Organizations: (5.1.11) The Project Leader may: Add or remove organizations from the list of trusted organizations (see §9.3) that are authorized to accept and hold assets for

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - (FFIS), Debian France

2014-03-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Lucas, On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 05:41:08PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: There are three organizations that never went through that process, and that either we use as if they were already TOs, or they would like to officially become a TO: FFIS, Debian.ch, and Debian France. As previously

Re: Prospective Trusted Organizations - (FFIS), Debian France

2014-03-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: While I don't think there's any question that FFIS should be one of Debian's TOs, I think having the answers to these questions is important in order to protect both parties, so that there's some record of what the expected relationship is