Hi! I'm not (yet) an official dd, but I started my applicant process
some weeks ago so I hope I'll be a DD soon. I'm interested in adopting
python-gd (my package is available on http://www.kobold.it/python-gd).
Actually there is only a whishlist bug for this package (#223580) which
ask for a
Le mar 15/06/2004 à 09:49, Fabio Tranchitella a écrit :
Hi! I'm not (yet) an official dd, but I started my applicant process
some weeks ago so I hope I'll be a DD soon. I'm interested in adopting
python-gd (my package is available on http://www.kobold.it/python-gd).
Actually there is only a
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
I'm interested in adopting python-gd (my package is available on
http://www.kobold.it/python-gd). Actually there is only a whishlist
bug for this package (#223580) which ask for a versioned packaging
for the module. Actually it is available only for python2.3, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is an implicit assumption here that python modules will actually work
for all versions of Python. This is clearly not the case; some will use
features only available in (some newer version X.y). Furthermore, at least a
few (distutils and
==
(BVIRUS GUARD and CHECK SERVICE for E-Mail Powerd by SYMANTEC Scan Engine.
(B
$B$"$J$?$,Aw$C$?%a!<%k$K%&%#%k%9$rH/8+$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B8!CN$5$l$?%&[EMAIL PROTECTED];_$N0Y!"%a!<%k$r:o=|CW$7$^$7$?!#(B
Il mar, 2004-06-15 alle 17:13, Cory Dodt ha scritto:
There is an implicit assumption here that python modules will actually work
for all versions of Python. This is clearly not the case; some will use
features only available in (some newer version X.y). Furthermore, at least a
few (distutils
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 12:09 pm, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
I know the number of packages in Debian is becoming a problem, simply I
don't uderstand why python2.1 (and a lot of modules for python2.1) are
available in testing (which will be stable soon) if it is an old version
and two major
Le mar 15/06/2004 à 19:09, Fabio Tranchitella a écrit :
In stable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.1, in testing and
unstable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.3... What about
python2.2? If I apt-get python2.2, why I can't use slang?
Why would you want to use python2.2?
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 09:08, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mar 15/06/2004 à 19:09, Fabio Tranchitella a écrit :
In stable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.1, in testing and
unstable there is a python-slang compiled for python2.3... What about
python2.2? If I apt-get python2.2, why
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 09:03 pm, Donovan Baarda wrote:
Even now, there are still several
applications, including Zope, still running on python2.2, when the
default is python2.3 and has been for some time.
I don't think so:
Zope =2.6 needs Python 2.1.3, while Zope 2.7 and X3.0.0
both use
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 13:52, Terry Hancock wrote:
[...]
Zope =2.6 needs Python 2.1.3, while Zope 2.7 and X3.0.0
both use Python 2.3.4 as standard (i.e. the newest Python).
Zope 2.6 *can* run with Python 2.2 (and I think it may be the
only version for which that's true), but it is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've packaged the pylibpcap module for python for Debian.
Pylibpcap is an interface to allow the use of the pcap library in
python
srcipts. pcap is a library that allows sniffing packets coming from network
interfaces.
12 matches
Mail list logo
