Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 22:49 -0500, Phillip J. Eby a écrit :
Just a reminder: without the .egg-info metadata (or something similar), we
aren't fulfilling one of the primary use cases, which is Debian users
wanting their bleeding-edge installs to not duplicate stable packages.
This
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 09:45 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 16:26 -0600, Ian Bicking a écrit :
[...]
easy_install works, right now, for these packages. There are some
outstanding issues, and those issues can probably be resolved in
easy_install, without any
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 08:57 -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 10:29 AM 11/25/2005 +, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 01:33 -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
[...]
In the case where the user is *not* using easy_install, then all
dependencies will be met by system packages, and the
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 27 novembre 2005 à 16:26 -0600, Ian Bicking a écrit :
No one is forcing Debian to package any of these.
Of course you are forcing Debian to package these. As long as your
projects have enough users, someone will want to build a Debian package.
The whole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Starting a separate thread from the formencode as .egg in Debian ??
discussion since this issue is internal to Debian and I don't want DD's to
beat-up upstream development anymore. :-)
Good or bad python .egg's are here to stay. Following the
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 13:51 -0600, Bob Tanner a écrit :
IF Debian decides -not- to support .egg's a few python code bases (modules,
applications, etc) will break.
Looking into the future more python code bases will move to .egg so the
number of broken code bases will only increase.
Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 11:27 -0600, Ian Bicking a écrit :
That's okay; I'll just tell my users to use it when Debian packages are
not available (which is the case for the majority of Python libraries,
and probably always will be unless libraries are automatically
packaged).
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:51:26PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote:
Starting a separate thread from the formencode as .egg in Debian ??
discussion since this issue is internal to Debian and I don't want DD's to
beat-up upstream development anymore. :-)
Thank you for bringing this up. The beating of
On Monday 28 November 2005 03:22 pm, Josselin Mouette wrote:
You are completely misunderstanding the issue. There can be no such
thing as Debian support for eggs. There can only be some Debian
packages of eggified software. And there will be, as some developers
will want to make them.
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creating debs easily is a good idea if done correctly, but only for
packages that will eventually enter the archive. It's a very bad
idea to encourage people to build their own versions of Debian
packages. It would lead to a horrible cluttering of
10 matches
Mail list logo
