Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One example is .config maintainer scripts, some of which are quite complex
and worth writing in a higher-level language than shell.
This is surely true; Steve Langasek asked if this was a real issue in
Ubuntu or merely a potential issue.
Granted if it
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:40:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I asked this question earlier, and no one answered. Are there .config
scripts being written in python today in Ubuntu? (Hmm, where are the python
bindings for debconf, and what ensures
Steve Langasek writes:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:47:19AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:06:39PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
the design decision of putting the binary-all python packages in a
separate directory into
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 11:14:19AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
If you won't acknowledge that, then know that upstream also object to the
name python-base for something which has a stripped-down standard library.
Both pythol-minimal and python-base sound to something an end user would
expect to
Ramon Bastiaans wrote:
I was wondering on the status of a version 0.7 package for
python-sqlobject. It's current package is still at version 0.6, while
version 0.7 has been released in October 2005.
I'll confess that I'm partly to blame for the delay. v0.7 needs formencode
and Fabio
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I definitely agree we should listen to the Python community,
Well, my *personal* view is this: I agree that it is highly
desirable that the python package is the entire thing, with
all batteries included. I'm uncertain what to think about
offering systems that only have a
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 01:48 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One example is .config maintainer scripts, some of which are quite complex
and worth writing in a higher-level language than shell.
This is surely true; Steve Langasek asked if this was
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:48:11AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One example is .config maintainer scripts, some of which are quite complex
and worth writing in a higher-level language than shell.
This is surely true; Steve Langasek asked if
Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's nothing that prevents us saying we aren't going to support
every high-level language and stick to more than one (we already stick
to two -- sh and Perl). It just means I'd like to write scripts in X
alone isn't a good enough reason.
Yes, this
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Granted if it is a real issue, then why not use perl? Yes, I hate
perl too, but really, the argument hey, people like Python too
implies that we should have a scheme interpreter, a perl, a python,
emacs lisp, and well, everything anyone might want.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 02:21:34PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Python is the official language of Ubuntu. If we want to merge work
they're doing (Anthony Towns mentioned their work on boot speed, for
example) it's a good idea to structure our Python like theirs is. This
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:04:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Granted if it is a real issue, then why not use perl? Yes, I hate
perl too, but really, the argument hey, people like Python too
Don't reply to me directly. I should not have to tell you this.
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 13:03 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Python is the official language of Ubuntu. If we want to merge work
they're doing (Anthony Towns mentioned their work on boot speed, for
example) it's a good idea to
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 01:04:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Granted if it is a real issue, then why not use perl? Yes, I hate
perl too, but really, the argument hey, people like Python too
implies that we should have a scheme
Joe Wreschnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We can burn those bridges when we come to them. Right now there's only
one such distribution, with one such language, which has already done
all the work to strip it down to a small size.
Scalability problems do not happen because someone failed to stop
Hi,
I want to Debian package the little shout-python software:
http://icecast.org/download.php
(in the midle of the page)
The upstream tarball is:
http://downloads.us.xiph.org/releases/libshout/shout-python-0.2.tar.gz
What name should I give to it?
- libhsout-python ?
- python-shout ?
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:18:57 +0100
Rakotomandimby Mihamina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I want to Debian package the little shout-python software:
http://icecast.org/download.php
(in the midle of the page)
The upstream tarball is:
17 matches
Mail list logo
