Updated libapache2-mod-python package

2006-05-16 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
Hi, last night I prepared an updated libapache2-mod-python package. If you're running unstable, and use libapache2-mod-python, please give it a try and report feedback. http://people.debian.org/~nobse/temp/libapache2-mod-python/ Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/13/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 12 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote: > > How about, right now, just a statement "this is what the issues are". > > Or even, "this [URL here] is the mailing list post where the issues > > are outlined." > > I forgot about them. So, I need

Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9

2006-05-16 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/4/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Em Qui, 2006-05-04 às 10:38 -0300, Gustavo Franco escreveu: > I think you can do that, but since it's isn't our default option (we > usually keep just debian/ for those who don't know yet) it can confuse > people working on this package

Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9

2006-05-16 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/13/06, Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Em Qua, 2006-05-10 às 22:53 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: > In the mean time, I'm working on packaging the stuff needed by TG 0.9; I finished the first working packaging of TurboGears 0.9, and uploaded a tarball with all the p

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I think the Python BoF happened, so is there a thread somewhere with > what was discussed, a wiki article or even a blog entry ? I trust that > the guys involved took non insane decisions but i would like to know, > since we've more than 50 packages to k

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/16/06, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 16 May 2006, Gustavo Franco wrote: > I think the Python BoF happened, so is there a thread somewhere with > what was discussed, a wiki article or even a blog entry ? I trust that > the guys involved took non insane decisions but i wou

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 13:48 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > We agreed to switch to python-2.4 in the week following debconf (next week > that is) and go on with whatever we have at that time. I'm afraid Matthias hasn't agreed to that. He has agreed to upload python-defaults v2.4 once we have i

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 17:04 -0300, Gustavo Franco a écrit : > > Matthias has some updates on python-central on his laptop and he should > > upload it somewhere so that we can take a look. > > Ok, but what's the point here? Are we going to drop python-support > usage ? Will python-central provides

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/16/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 13:48 -0500, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > We agreed to switch to python-2.4 in the week following debconf (next week > that is) and go on with whatever we have at that time. I'm afraid Matthias hasn't agreed to that. H

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 5/16/06, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 17:04 -0300, Gustavo Franco a écrit : > > Matthias has some updates on python-central on his laptop and he should > > upload it somewhere so that we can take a look. > > Ok, but what's the point here? Are we going to d

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-16 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In short, the main decision has been to drop entirely python2.x-foo > packages. They will, however, be provided as virtual packages, but only > if something actually needs them. > ... > For C extensions, it was decided to build them for all av