Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:03:15AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In short, the main decision has been to drop entirely python2.x-foo packages. They will, however, be provided as virtual packages, but only if something actually needs them.

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-17 Thread Ganesan Rajagopal
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 14:12 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal a écrit : I understand the upgrade issues that pythonX.Y packages cause with multiple versions of python in Debian. However, for binary modules I don't really see an alternative in some cases.

Re: on packaging TurboGears 0.8.9

2006-05-17 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Hey! Em Sáb, 2006-05-13 às 21:42 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: Comments? Bug reports to my email address, please. May I go on and upload the packages to unstable? I'll upload TurboGears 0.9 to experimental, if it is ok, 'till it is released as stable. The modules will go straight to

Re: python 2.4?

2006-05-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 10:06:59AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Le jeudi 18 mai 2006 à 08:17 +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal a écrit : There's no point in simplifying python packaging if in fact it becomes more complicated because we allow