hence no reason to allow for a transition to testing. Moreover, I
promise that pymvpa will not attempt such thing ;-)
What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it?
Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it
fixed. For example try building
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
3) upload to experimental
3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
I'd recommends this.
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian:
[Christopher Lunsford, 2009-02-05]
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/charm/charm_1.9.1-1.dsc
* PAPT is in Maintainer field, join PAPT and inject the package into our repo
* python-feedparser is missing in Recommends (Depends?)
* add ${misc:Depends} to Depends
* no need to build
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Christopher Lunsford wrote:
Dear Debian-Python,
I am looking for some peer reviews on my package charm, and possibly a
mentor.
Package name: charm
Version : 1.9.1-1
Upstream Author : Lydia Leong evil...@livejournal.com
URL :
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
3) upload to experimental
3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
I'd recommends this.
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009):
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course.
So he needs to invest his time in the
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009):
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
himself, because he cannot use debian
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..),
there is probably no other way.
I'm unhappy about it too, but I don't understand it. Where can I find
an explanation
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..),
there is probably no other way.
I'm unhappy about
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au (06/02/2009):
I'm unhappy about it too, but I don't understand it. Where can I find
an explanation for the necessity of freezing ‘unstable’ when preparing
to release ‘testing’?
For more than verbose explanations, see -devel@ a few weeks ago,
starting at
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:50:36AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time,
12 matches
Mail list logo
