Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:23:02 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 02/20/2013 06:20 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > * Figure out whether full-source or debian/ only works better (maybe give > > us> > > both repos so we can play with them and discuss the pros and cons from > > actual working ex

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:23:02 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > The idea to use "git archive" was mostly from Julien Danjou. It's > very nice because that way, we can use xz compression, instead > of what upstream provides (that is, github .zip or .tar.gz, which > isn't the best). See devref 6

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/20/2013 06:20 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > * Figure out whether full-source or debian/ only works better (maybe give us > both repos so we can play with them and discuss the pros and cons from > actual working examples). What is important, I believe, is that git-buildpackage always works.

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 05:20:48 PM Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Feb 19, 2013, at 09:42 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > >After that it gets tricky, because we'd knock E out next, but the I'm not > >sure where the votes counted for E (Scott & Barry) should be reallocated. > > If it makes things easie

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 20.02.2013 00:53, schrieb Piotr Ożarowski: > [Barry Warsaw, 2013-02-19] >> So I still think it comes down to, them that does the work gets to >> decide, but there *is* work to do. It's clear we don't want multiple >> vcses. So I think you have an opportunity to convince us by: >> >> * Doing a

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Ludovic Gasc
On Feb 19, 2013 11:21 PM, "Barry Warsaw" wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2013, at 09:42 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > > >After that it gets tricky, because we'd knock E out next, but the I'm not > >sure where the votes counted for E (Scott & Barry) should be reallocated. > > If it makes things easier, I am es

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Barry Warsaw, 2013-02-19] > So I still think it comes down to, them that does the work gets to decide, but > there *is* work to do. It's clear we don't want multiple vcses. So I think > you have an opportunity to convince us by: > > * Doing a test migration and putting a test repo up so we can

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Daniele Tricoli
On Tuesday 19 February 2013 23:20:48 Barry Warsaw wrote: > If it makes things easier, I am essentially sided with Piotr. The fact > that I don't like git much is immaterial - I want a dvcs and don't have > the time to put into a bzr or hg migration. I don't have time to put > into a git migration

Re: RFR: python-qrcode -- native python module to generate QR codes

2013-02-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Cornelius Kölbel , 2013-02-18, 18:05: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qrcode/qrcode_2.4.2-1.dsc "XSPV: 2.6, 2.7" is better than "XSPV: current", but please make it: XS-Python-Version: >= 2.6 The description has improved, thanks. :) I'd remove this sentence, though: "So it depen

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 19, 2013, at 09:42 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: >After that it gets tricky, because we'd knock E out next, but the I'm not >sure where the votes counted for E (Scott & Barry) should be reallocated. If it makes things easier, I am essentially sided with Piotr. The fact that I don't like git m

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Robert Collins
I didn't vote initiall because I read the below as a summary... On 17 February 2013 01:43, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 16 February 2013 09:10, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >> It would be really stupid to only want to "claim" to be working as part >> of the team, that's not at all what I want to do. I

Re: RFR: python-qrcode -- native python module to generate QR codes

2013-02-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Cornelius Kölbel , 2013-02-18, 17:38: lintian --pedantic produced no error, lintian4py --pedantic produced: p: python-qrcode: pyflakes-unused-import usr/share/pyshared/qrcode/__init__.py:1: make p: python-qrcode: pyflakes-unused-import usr/share/pyshared/qrcode/__init__.py:3: image How pedant

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Charlie Smotherman
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 19 February 2013 17:55, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >> Thomas Kluyver >> Seems to be ok with migrating to Git (so, option D) > > > I voted CDBA in the same e-mail that I introduced the poll ;-). Thanks for > summarising the votes. > > Inclu

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 19 February 2013 17:55, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Thomas Kluyver > Seems to be ok with migrating to Git (so, option D) I voted CDBA in the same e-mail that I introduced the poll ;-). Thanks for summarising the votes. Including Piotr & Andreas, and putting people whose opinion you've described

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Andreas Noteng
Den 19. feb. 2013 18:55, skreiv Thomas Goirand: If the above isn't correct, please let everyone know your view. Thomas My contribution to this team is relatively low volume, but anyways: My vote is, in order of preference, DCAB. I'd also be happy with bzr (which I use for my Ubuntu stuff), but

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
FTR: I want to migrate to Git, but I don't have time to do the migration work right now, so I vote for status quo (unless someone will show me the code) -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fing

Re: Request to Join Project Python Modules Packaging Team from Ben Carrillo (kali-guest)

2013-02-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ben Carrillo , 2013-01-29, 20:02: [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-srp Now I had a look at this one, too. Implementation of the _ctsrp module is flawed: you must not load a shared library via the .so symlink. The symlink is supposed to be used at build-time one. As far I can s

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/20/2013 01:23 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> So far, those who could have vote C or D (this shows in previous reply >> that some could have voted that) didn't bother answering the "poll". > I've already expressed my opinion in this thre

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/20/2013 01:23 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> So far, those who could have vote C or D (this shows in previous reply >> that some could have voted that) didn't bother answering the "poll". > I've already expressed my opinion in this thre

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > So far, those who could have vote C or D (this shows in previous reply > that some could have voted that) didn't bother answering the "poll". I've already expressed my opinion in this thread, but to be formal: my vote is DA. -- Dmitry Shac

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 02/19/2013 06:08 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 18 February 2013 20:46, Ludovic Gasc > wrote: > > I vote D, and I can handle the migration from SVN to Git, I've > done this several times for my work and WYMeditor. > > Are you interested? > > I'm interested p