Hi Daniele (2015.10.03_21:36:52_+0200)
> charade was fortunately merged into chardet so we can also remove the SVN
> repository (or ignore it).
Yeah, I think there'll be a bunch of those. I basically migrated
everything from the SVN history, that didn't break horrifically. Then we
can strip it do
Hello Stefano,
many thanks for working on this!
On Saturday 03 October 2015 20:52:21 Stefano Rivera wrote:
[CUT list of packages]
> Cannot "git-dpm init" package: python-charade
charade was fortunately merged into chardet so we can also remove the SVN
repository (or ignore it).
Cheers,
--
Da
Hi Sandro (2015.10.03_12:47:20_+0200)
> I probably didnt make myself clear at first, let me retry: what were
> the problems that -in the last period- delayed the conversion?
No significant failures, but I wanted to setup an mr config, which I've
done now:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-mod
On Oct 03, 2015, at 03:50 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>if the last is a strong requirement, honestly it seems fragile: ~/.gitconfig
>applies to all the git repos I have (and I may want to specify a tag format
>there), while what is set in debian/.git-dpm (is this the file where the tag
>format is set r
> A good way to test that (when Stefano puts up the next test conversion) is to
> make some change, then `git-dpm tag` and verify that the tag form is correct.
> Be sure you don't have any settings in ~/.gitconfig though.
if the last is a strong requirement, honestly it seems fragile:
~/.gitconfig
On sam. 03 oct. 2015 à 16:15:53, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2015-10-03]
> > Yes, do-it-o-craty is good, at some point, but this is exactly what brought
> > Thomas out. So nope, it's not enough.
>
> and if I didn't do it, it would be better because...
> It's easy to point finge
On Oct 03, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>what were the problems that -in the last period- delayed the conversion? were
>they just lack of time (understandable) or were they technical in the
>conversion process?
The very last patch I forwarded to Stefano involved correctly setting the tag
[Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2015-10-03]
> Yes, do-it-o-craty is good, at some point, but this is exactly what brought
> Thomas out. So nope, it's not enough.
and if I didn't do it, it would be better because...
It's easy to point fingers if it's not you who cleans after each mess.
/me (AKA dictator wh
On jeu. 01 oct. 2015 à 18:48:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, October 01, 2015 02:11:29 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Oct 01, 2015, at 07:47 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > >I am a bit worried that the team is handled behind closed walls.
> >
> > I have no particular interest in either grab
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Sandro (2015.10.02_22:46:00_+0200)
>> those are not many days to review the results of the conversions: can
>> you (or Stefano) share what were the problems that delayed the
>> transition, so that we can check in particular those aspects
Hi Sandro (2015.10.02_22:46:00_+0200)
> those are not many days to review the results of the conversions: can
> you (or Stefano) share what were the problems that delayed the
> transition, so that we can check in particular those aspects of the
> packages we know the most?
I did that several month
Hi Piotr (2015.09.29_23:05:19_+0200)
> we agreed to something - 1 package per person, just for tests, with
> reports sent to this mailing list. Can you point me to a single report?
> Can you point me to a single person who converted only one package?
Me. I didn't report-back as such. I just rolled
12 matches
Mail list logo