Re: entry-point script and private module install directory

2016-05-11 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
FTR: [Piotr Ożarowski, 2016-05-11] > dh_auto_install -- --install-lib=/usr/share/pyfr/ this one ^ should be: dh_auto_install -- --install-args='--install-lib=/usr/share/pyfr/' or you can: export PYBUILD_INSTALL_ARGS=--install-lib=/usr/share/pyfr/ (thanks to Dmitry Shachnev for

Re: entry-point script and private module install directory

2016-05-11 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Ghislain Vaillant, 2016-05-11] > Dear all, > > I have a package (pyfr), which is meant to be used as a command-line > application only. > > The main script (pyfr) is installed via setuptools' > entry_points['console_scripts'], which generates the entry-point > automatically and places it under

entry-point script and private module install directory

2016-05-11 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Dear all, I have a package (pyfr), which is meant to be used as a command-line application only. The main script (pyfr) is installed via setuptools' entry_points['console_scripts'], which generates the entry-point automatically and places it under /usr/bin. However, when I install the

Re: pypy pakages

2016-05-11 Thread Barry Warsaw
On May 10, 2016, at 09:56 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: >I think it would be great if we could get performance-sensitive applications >running on PyPy instead of CPython, but of course this requires the whole >dependency graph to have pypy-* packages built. That might be a good approach to

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Christopher Baines
On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: >> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: >>> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it because there's no reverse

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: >> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it >>> because there's no reverse dependency for it. >> >> Thanks for packaging it :) >>

Updating python-django-tagging (0.4.1 -> 0.4.3)

2016-05-11 Thread Christopher Baines
Hey, Is anyone available to review and upload a new version of python-django-tagging [1][2]? The changelog is: * New upstream release * Convert debian/copyright to the DEP-5 format * Add myself as an uploader * Remove the fix_calc_tag_weight patch, as this has been merged upstream *

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Christopher Baines
On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it >> because there's no reverse dependency for it. > > Thanks for packaging it :) > >> If you want to continue maintaining it within the