Re: python2.2 for sarge?

2002-07-26 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2002-07-26 klockan 03.31 skrev Donovan Baarda: > If people are using the "simple wrapper" approach to supporting the default > Python, then switching to 2.2 would just consist of releasing empty wrapper > packages with changed dependancies... pretty easy NMU stuff. > > If people are screaming

Re: Please remove python1.5 from unstable

2002-08-23 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2002-08-23 klockan 13.33 skrev Matthias Klose: > Package: ftp.debian.org > > Please remove the python1.5 source package and all depending binary > packages from unstable. Users needing python1.5 can still download > these packages from woody. I'd rather see that Python 1.5 makes it into sarge

Re: Please remove python1.5 from unstable

2002-08-23 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2002-08-23 klockan 18.28 skrev Jim Penny: > What packages do you have in mind? Some of the c-extension maintainers, > myself included, have an informal policy of "support everything in the > distribution", but do not have any obejection to supporting less! The package I'm maintaining and deve

Re: Fwd: python-biggles bug

2002-09-23 Thread Martin Sjögren
mÃn 2002-09-23 klockan 22.34 skrev Graham Wilson: > > Not in my reading of python policy. As far as I can see the creation > > of a python-module package is optional. Then again the python policy > > document is pretty unreadable in this section and needs to be fixed. > > If you have issues with

Re: Documentation generation scripts

2003-05-09 Thread Martin Sjögren
;s what I do, and I'm also upstream of pyopenssl, it's handy to distribute it so it works everywhere. /Martin -- Martin Sjögren [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines h

Re: PythonCard packaging advice?

2003-02-04 Thread Martin Sjögren
tis 2003-02-04 klockan 12.46 skrev Bastian Kleineidam: > > This is getting a bit more complicated than I expected it to be. I'd > > appreciate any advice you can give me. > I don't know why you split docs and samples, I'd put them in one package, > the samples go into /usr/share/doc//examples/. Th