Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-12 Thread Christopher Baines
On 12/05/16 15:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/12/2016 10:13 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: On 12/05/16 07:57, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: On 23/12/15 15:30,

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/12/2016 10:13 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 12/05/16 07:57, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: >>> On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: >>

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-12 Thread Christopher Baines
On 12/05/16 07:57, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: >> On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> I wa

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: >>> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Christopher Baines
On 11/05/16 13:19, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: >> On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: >>> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it because there's no reverse dependen

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/11/2016 11:31 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: >> On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it >>> because there's no reverse dependency for it. >> >> Thanks for packaging it :) >>

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2016-05-11 Thread Christopher Baines
On 23/12/15 15:30, Christopher Baines wrote: > On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it >> because there's no reverse dependency for it. > > Thanks for packaging it :) > >> If you want to continue maintaining it within the Ope

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2015-12-23 Thread Christopher Baines
On 23/12/15 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I was the maintainer of this package, though I lost interest for it > because there's no reverse dependency for it. Thanks for packaging it :) > If you want to continue maintaining it within the OpenStack PKG team, > you can do it as well. Though we're n

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2015-12-23 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/19/2015 07:06 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:34:15AM +, Christopher Baines wrote: >> [...] >> >> The source package can be found here [3], would it be best to try to >> continue with the history in that repository and bring it in to >> complia

Re: Adopting factory-boy

2015-12-19 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Christopher, On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:34:15AM +, Christopher Baines wrote: > [...] > > The source package can be found here [3], would it be best to try to > continue with the history in that repository and bring it in to > compliance with the team policy (use pristine-tar, use upstream t

Adopting factory-boy

2015-12-19 Thread Christopher Baines
I use python-factory-boy [1] and recently realised that it was removed from Debian [2]. The reasoning being that it is no longer a dependency of some OpenStack packages. I use this (currently through a package of the latest upstream release created with py2dsc), and would be interested in getting