Re: Boost.Python: providing libs for both Python 2.4 and 2.5.

2008-03-24 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:18:17PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: I wrote about three weeks ago [1] that I'm trying to get Boost's Python extension helper library building with multiple Python versions. Several very helpful suggestions were made, for which I am grateful. I have been

Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Boost.Python: providing libs for both Python 2.4 and 2.5.

2008-03-24 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 05:52:47PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: However, it looks to be like the shlibs file needs updating. Yes, and thanks for the bug report. Upload is being prepared now. -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Boost.Python: providing libs for both Python 2.4 and 2.5.

2008-03-22 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:59:30PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: I do, however, see a couple of concrete issues with your script: if [ $1 = -d ]; then debug=-d shift fi Shouldn't you fix that at build time à la $version? You noticed a complication I was avoiding. There are

Re: [pkg-boost-devel] Boost.Python: providing libs for both Python 2.4 and 2.5.

2008-03-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libraries, including the Boost.Python libraries. The only difference in names is that the debug libraries have -d in them. So I was avoiding two scripts by this parameterization. Ah, thanks for clarifying; I had forgotten about the -dbg package,

Boost.Python: providing libs for both Python 2.4 and 2.5.

2008-03-21 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hello, I wrote about three weeks ago [1] that I'm trying to get Boost's Python extension helper library building with multiple Python versions. Several very helpful suggestions were made, for which I am grateful. I have been plugging away, very slowly, ever since. I'm hoping to upload it later

Re: Boost.Python: providing libs for both Python 2.4 and 2.5.

2008-03-21 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Steve M. Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This allows extension builders to select either the default Python version, or a specific version, without knowing the Boost and GCC versions [2]. Yep; so far so good. I'd like to ask about intended behaviour if a bad action is supplied. Or if an