Christian Kastner writes:
> In http://wiki.debian.org/Python/DbgBuilds, we argued for ‘Recommends:
> python-dbg’ if the package can be used without the debug interpreter
> (eg: it contains the stripped debugging symbols for use with gdb);
> otherwise, ‘Depends: python-dbg’.
That covers it. Thank
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:23:35 +1100, Ben Finney
wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> What relationship should be declared between a binary ‘python-foo-dbg’
> package and the ‘python-dbg’ package?
>
> I can't remember the rationale, but the consensus was not what I
> expected. Should the binary package ‘Depend
Howdy all,
What relationship should be declared between a binary ‘python-foo-dbg’
package and the ‘python-dbg’ package?
My search-fu must be weak today. I remember a discussion somewhere
regarding Python extensions in C and the resulting ‘python-foo-dbg’
package.
I can't remember the rationale,
3 matches
Mail list logo