On July 1, 2024 6:08:31 PM UTC, Matthias Klose wrote:
>On 29.06.24 20:29, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 1:36:41 PM EDT Soren Stoutner wrote:
>>> Scott,
>>>
>>> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would say no. Distutils is going to be
On 29.06.24 20:29, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2024 1:36:41 PM EDT Soren Stoutner wrote:
Scott,
On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time,
even
though it's no longer part of the standa
Le lun. 1 juil. 2024 à 00:09, Emmanuel Arias a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 10:08:46PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> > Here I was precisely asking about the remaining open 46 bugs [0]
> > that ask to remove the (mostly stale) "python3-distutils" dependencies.
>
> > Making these bugs RC no
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 10:08:46PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Here I was precisely asking about the remaining open 46 bugs [0]
> that ask to remove the (mostly stale) "python3-distutils" dependencies.
>
> python3-distutils has been removed from Ubuntu since 24.04 [1]
> and a lot of these 46
On 2024-06-29 2 h 29 p.m., Scott Kitterman wrote:
According to codesearch.d.n over 600 packages reference disutils in their
code. That doesn't mean that they all use it, but it's a lot of packages.
FWIW, I wrote a lintian tag to flag these packages:
https://udd.debian.org/lintian-tag.cgi?tag=
Here I was precisely asking about the remaining open 46 bugs [0]
that ask to remove the (mostly stale) "python3-distutils" dependencies.
python3-distutils has been removed from Ubuntu since 24.04 [1]
and a lot of these 46 packages carry there these single line patch: [2]
while some Debian packages
Thanks for the followup information.
For reference, one of the packages I maintain, electrum, only uses one command
from
distutils, which compares version numbers to determine if there is a new
upstream release.
Upstream decided to simply incorporate that distutils file with that one
command
On 2024-06-29 19:42:13 +0200 (+0200), Carsten Schoenert wrote:
[...]
> We could manage a migration to another Python build system
> "somehow", but then I think the time until the freeze is to short
> to fix all these packages if we wanted to drop distutils, beside
> the other work that is needed to
On Saturday, June 29, 2024 1:36:41 PM EDT Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Scott,
>
> On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time,
> > even
> > though it's no longer part of the standard distribution.
> >
> > Sc
Am 29.06.24 um 19:36 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
Scott,
On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote:
I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time, even
though it's no longer part of the standard distribution.
Scott K
Can you please elaborate on this s
Scott,
On Saturday, June 29, 2024 8:58:09 AM MST Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time, even
> though it's no longer part of the standard distribution.
>
> Scott K
Can you please elaborate on this some more? As a maintainer of a couple of
I would say no. Distutils is going to be with us for quite some time, even
though it's no longer part of the standard distribution.
Scott K
On June 29, 2024 2:07:56 PM UTC, Alexandre Detiste
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Should the severity of the distutils removal bugs be bumped now ?
>Example such bug: ht
Hi,
Should the severity of the distutils removal bugs be bumped now ?
Example such bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065939
Greetings
Le sam. 29 juin 2024 à 10:46, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> binNMUs are now done, next thing is to get python3-defaults migrating,
> filing b
On 24.06.24 10:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 22.06.24 00:06, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
Hi team,
As the Louis-Philippe and Andreas response to my last mail [0]
I would like to propose a (regular?) IRC meeting to try to organize
the work inside the team. I would like to propose an IRC meeting
on 5 Jul
On 22.06.24 00:06, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
Hi team,
As the Louis-Philippe and Andreas response to my last mail [0]
I would like to propose a (regular?) IRC meeting to try to organize
the work inside the team. I would like to propose an IRC meeting
on 5 July, perhaps a good time could be around 12P
Time frame is ok for me
Am 22.06.24 um 03:07 schrieb Emmanuel Arias:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, day and time it's just a proposal.
Cheers,
Emmanuel
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:16:51PM +, weepingclown wrote:
Hi,
I do support the idea of an IRC meeting. although the availability of oth
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, day and time it's just a proposal.
Cheers,
Emmanuel
On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:16:51PM +, weepingclown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do support the idea of an IRC meeting. although the availability of others
> (maybe even myself) is something I can't comment on. But I s
Hi,
I do support the idea of an IRC meeting. although the availability of others
(maybe even myself) is something I can't comment on. But I still think trying
this out, at the very least, would be nice. Hopefully this can be a catalyst
for finishing up the 3.12 migration. 3.13 migration is prob
Hi team,
As the Louis-Philippe and Andreas response to my last mail [0]
I would like to propose a (regular?) IRC meeting to try to organize
the work inside the team. I would like to propose an IRC meeting
on 5 July, perhaps a good time could be around 12PM UTC and 4PM UTC?
That date and time work
19 matches
Mail list logo
