Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-09-12 Thread Dominik George
Hi, I would like to ask for review and sponsorship of the osmalchemy package. It can be found in the usual place at: git.debian.org:/git/python-modules/packages/osmalchemy.git The package can be build with gbp using pristine-tar. It appears to be lintian-clean, apart from a missing upstream chan

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-09-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 09/12/2016 03:39 PM, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to ask for review and sponsorship of the osmalchemy package. > > It can be found in the usual place at: > git.debian.org:/git/python-modules/packages/osmalchemy.git > > The package can be build with gbp using pristine-tar. It a

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-09-28 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Thomas Goirand, 2016-09-28] > * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional. why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I probably missed an announcement about the reason... -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-09-28 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Thomas, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:41:22AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > debian/docs: > > * It looks like the README.rst could be transformed into .html using > sphinx. Could you do that? It'd look a lot nicer. Sphinx is an overkill here. For a simple file like this, one can use

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-09-28 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Dmitry Shachnev, 2016-09-28] > > * It looks like the README.rst could be transformed into .html using > > sphinx. Could you do that? It'd look a lot nicer. > > Sphinx is an overkill here. For a simple file like this, one can use > rst2html (from python3-docutils package). even if you convert it,

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-10-02 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 09/28/2016 11:31 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Thomas Goirand, 2016-09-28] >> * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional. > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I > probably missed an announcement about the reason... Because of https://www.debian.org

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-10-03 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
> >> * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional. > > > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I > > probably missed an announcement about the reason... > > > Because of > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities > maybe? :) I d

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-10-03 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2016-10-03 10:12:04, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > >> * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional. > > > > > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I > > > probably missed an announcement about the reason... > > > > > > Because of > > https://www.debian.org/

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-10-03 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Sebastian Ramacher, 2016-10-03] > > > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I > > > > probably missed an announcement about the reason... [...] > Where is the myth that they change priority to extra even coming from? all my NEW packages have extra by default eve

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-10-03 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2016-10-03 11:19:10, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Sebastian Ramacher, 2016-10-03] > > > > > why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra > > > > > but I > > > > > probably missed an announcement about the reason... > [...] > > Where is the myth that they change priority to ex

Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package

2016-10-22 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10/03/2016 10:12 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: * Please set "Priority: extra" and not optional. >>> >>> why? I know ftp-masters change all packages from optional to extra but I >>> probably missed an announcement about the reason... >> >> >> Because of >> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-po

[WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ...

2016-09-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Forum, On 27/09/16 23:41, Thomas Goirand wrote: > debian/docs: > > * It looks like the README.rst could be transformed into .html using > sphinx. Could you do that? It'd look a lot nicer. Some software comes with a README.md, README.rst, ... which are the same version of a tex

Re: [WAS: Re: Review/sponsorship of osmalchemy package] md , rst, txt, html, ...

2016-09-27 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Jerome, I may not fully understand the issue, but why not keep *.md, *.rst, *.pod, etc. the way they are? The main advantage of *.md, *.rst, *.pod, etc. is their readability. Their additional advantage is that they can easily be transferred into *.html or many other formats, if desired. A mis