On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 07:16:14PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> >> Let me reexplain the situation i was talking about with a little graph:
> >> python-editobj (using python-support)
> >>|
> >> python2.3-soya (compiled)
> >>|
> >> python-ontopofsoya (using python-support)
> >
Coin,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Let me reexplain the situation i was talking about with a little graph:
>
>> python-editobj (using python-support)
>>|
>> python2.3-soya (compiled)
>>|
>> python-ontopofsoya (using python-support)
>>|
>> slune
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:34:37PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> > As Steve suggested, this can be solved by introducing a new variable
> > named ${python:Provides} in dh_python, which will read the .version as
> > well. Then, python-editobj will have a
> > Provides: python2.3-editobj, python2
Coin Joss,
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As Steve suggested, this can be solved by introducing a new variable
> named ${python:Provides} in dh_python, which will read the .version as
> well. Then, python-editobj will have a
> Provides: python2.3-editobj, python2.4-editobj
Le mercredi 10 mai 2006 à 16:32 +0200, Marc Dequènes a écrit :
> I wonder how some situations (if existing) may be solved as long as we
> have unique non-versioned scripts-only packages and compiled modules
> cohabiting. When for eg python2.4-soya needs editobj, it just depends on
> python-editobj
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow, what a constructive response. You've surely been on this list for
> years and must know all the changes that need to be made to Debian's python
> policy. Why didn't you reply to Bruce's original question with your own
> superior write-up of this
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Any summaries, partial specs, top level descriptions, particularly good
> >> explanations of the stumbling blocks, etc., available for reading?
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PythonRoad
Coin,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Any summaries, partial specs, top level descriptions, particularly good
>> explanations of the stumbling blocks, etc., available for reading?
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PythonRoadmap
Is this Ubuntu roadmap of any concern for Debian ? Is doko
Le dimanche 30 avril 2006 à 01:48 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > Any summaries, partial specs, top level descriptions, particularly good
> > explanations of the stumbling blocks, etc., available for reading?
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PythonRoadmap
As far as I know, this "roadmap" has neve
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 10:40:50PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Sat April 29 2006 16:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 06:28:32PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > > Also, to make python-gtk2 support more than one version, we could
> > > only achieve that by providing the
On Sat April 29 2006 16:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 06:28:32PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > Also, to make python-gtk2 support more than one version, we could
> > only achieve that by providing the extensions in a single package
> > or building them on install time
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 06:28:32PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Today I was playing with the idea of having gazpacho support multiple
> versions of Python. Nothing really forbids it, since it doesn't use
> anything that is specific to python2.4, for example.
> So I added gazpacho's modul
Le samedi 29 avril 2006 à 18:28 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva a écrit :
> That means I'll have whatever python version is the default one, since
> python-gtk2 is supposed to depend on python2.3-gtk2, and will switch to
> python2.4-gtk2. So I'm guaranteeing gazpacho will work, but I'll also
> have th
Hello,
Today I was playing with the idea of having gazpacho support multiple
versions of Python. Nothing really forbids it, since it doesn't use
anything that is specific to python2.4, for example.
So I added gazpacho's module under python-support's control and made it
not Depend on python >= 2.3
14 matches
Mail list logo
