Re: build package

2022-11-17 Thread Joshua Peisach
: build package Hello guys! Could someone help me to find out the error of this package? https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/librosa/-/jobs/3528766 Thanks! Nilson F. Silva

Re: build package

2022-11-17 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi, Cannot be because of the i386 arch? Cheers, Emmanuel On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 2:58 PM Nilson Silva wrote: > Hello guys! > > Could someone help me to find out the error of this package? > > https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/librosa/-/jobs/3528766 > > Thanks! > > Nilson F. Silva > > > >

build package

2022-11-17 Thread Nilson Silva
Hello guys! Could someone help me to find out the error of this package? https://salsa.debian.org/nilsonfsilva/librosa/-/jobs/3528766 Thanks! Nilson F. Silva

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello, just for info. I can confirm that the probleme was in the upstream build system, which was not compatible with the setuptools > 60. After patching the build system, I can confirm that without any change to the rules files. It works out of the box. So there is no issue in pybuild :)), or

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-02 Thread Jerome Kieffer
Hi Fred, Hi all other DD, I am the upstream author of pyFAI and fabio, I wish to thank you for taking care of the packaging of those software. I am aware there is an issue with the usage of those software since they use numpy.distutils (deprecated, to be removed in python3.12 and requires

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
tus 2 - Mail d’origine - De: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr À: Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org Envoyé: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 09:03:45 +0100 (CET) Objet: Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools Ok, I

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Ok, I understand better what is going on. in pyproject.toml there is these lines. [build-system] requires = [ "wheel", "setuptools<60.0.0", "oldest-supported-numpy", "scipy", "sphinx", "nbsphinx", "silx>=0.10", "Cython>=0.25" ] indeed the setuptools < 60, can not

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-02 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
', '-m', 'pip', '--disable-pip-version-check', 'wheel', '--no-deps', '-w', '/tmp/tmppdpybvy1', '--quiet', 'setuptools<60.0.0']' returned non-zero exit status 1. - Mail d’origine - De: Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com À: debian-python@lists.debian.org Envoyé: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> I dont think it should do that, so we need to investigate. Where can I > find > the updated packaging? I did not push the change right now, I will push once I solve this issue :). my opinion is that I should force via PYBUILD_SYSTEM=distutils Fred

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 3:31:47 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > I dont think it should do that, so we need to investigate. Where > > can I find the updated packaging? > > I did not push the change right now, I will push once I solve this issue :). > > my opinion is that I should

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
>It looks to me like the current pyproject.toml file for pyfai is not >sufficient > to build the package, so I would tempted to keep what you have now. Due to the presence of this file, pybuild try to build using the "new way" instead of building with setup.py. I do not know if other package

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 3:02:00 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > >It looks to me like the current pyproject.toml file for pyfai is not > >sufficient> > > to build the package, so I would tempted to keep what you have now. > > Due to the presence of this file, pybuild try to build

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> As far as I can see, the package doesnt ship any files in /usr/bin. > Why do > you need to build man pages (Im assuming thats what thats > for? More > generically, what problem did that step in the process solve thats not > solved > now? this is for the pyfai package which I need to

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:48:12 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:42:22 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > > As far as I can see, the package doesnt ship any files in > > > /usr/bin. > > > Why do you need to build man pages (Im assuming thats what > > >

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 2:42:22 PM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > As far as I can see, the package doesnt ship any files in /usr/bin. > > Why do you need to build man pages (Im assuming thats what > > thats for? More generically, what problem did that step in the > > process solve

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, November 1, 2022 11:15:59 AM EDT PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > thanks for your help. > > I have one more question > > I have this command from the previous build > > {interpreter} setup.py build_man > > how can I translate this with the new build systeme ? As far as I can see,

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-11-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
thanks for your help. I have one more question I have this command from the previous build {interpreter} setup.py build_man how can I translate this with the new build systeme ?

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-31 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, October 31, 2022 1:26:03 PM EDT Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Frederic, > > Am 31.10.22 um 08:57 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel: > >> I can build the package basically doing these modifications and by > >> adding the additional B-D package Scott did mention. Simply let > >>

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-31 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello Frederic, Am 31.10.22 um 08:57 schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel: I can build the package basically doing these modifications and by adding the additional B-D package Scott did mention. Simply let dh_sphinxdoc build the documentation and adding the additional needed package dependencies.

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-31 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> Hello Frederic, Hello Carsten > please could you provide next time direct links to the VCS/Tracker of > your package, that prevents time to search for the correct package on my > or others people side. Also a speaking subject content is helping me to > decide if I want to spend time on

Re: build package xrayutilities - wheel and pip with setuptools

2022-10-30 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello Frederic, please could you provide next time direct links to the VCS/Tracker of your package, that prevents time to search for the correct package on my or others people side. Also a speaking subject content is helping me to decide if I want to spend time on taking a look, you've choose

Re: Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package itself

2018-02-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lumin, On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:27:22PM +, Lumin wrote: > With patch [1] dpkg-buildpackage can go a bit further while building > this package. > See requirements-dev.txt. And new problems arose: I've added python-flask to Build-Depends and can reproduce this issue: > 1. $ make test #

Re: Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package itself

2018-02-06 Thread Lumin
Hi, On 6 February 2018 at 15:56, Andreas Tille wrote: > Would you mind pushing your patch directly? I do not see any advantage > if I would proxy your patch. ;-) Done. > I admit up to know I have not checked this file but probably having > these will help. Then I

Re: Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package itself

2018-02-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lumin, On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 03:27:22PM +, Lumin wrote: > I checked the packaging, Thanks a lot! > and my debuild ended up with an > error different from > >> AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'backport_assert_raises' > > According to a quick investigation on this

Re: Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package itself

2018-02-06 Thread Lumin
Hi Andreas, I checked the packaging, and my debuild ended up with an error different from > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'backport_assert_raises' According to a quick investigation on this problem, I'm sure there are still some missing B-Ds in control file. With patch

Re: Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package itself

2018-02-02 Thread Olivier Sallou
jet: Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package > itself > > Hi, > > as you might have noticed I finalised the preconditions to build > python-moto which is in salsa.d.o[1]. When trying to build I get: > > > >dh_auto_test -O--b

Preconditions for python-moto finished - help needed to build package itself

2018-02-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as you might have noticed I finalised the preconditions to build python-moto which is in salsa.d.o[1]. When trying to build I get: dh_auto_test -O--buildsystem=pybuild I: pybuild base:184: python2.7 setup.py test running test running egg_info writing requirements to