On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:11:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> *dons devscripts maintainer hat*
> fwiw, if I were applying this change at the moment, it would be likely
> to be commited as per the attached.
> *removes hat*
>
> Thomas has a reasonable point though; it would be good not to break
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:44:23 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Last time I checked, libesd-alsa0 was still completely unusable (well,
> except for some weird kind of sound-based torture).
I regularly help users to find out why their sound has stopped working,
and the cause is usually due to libes
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 18:24 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
> >
> > http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
> >
> > Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
>
> Thanks,
Hi Filippo,
Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> we have had a little trouble with our sf redirector a while back (i.e. the
> sf mirror was down) and it is really annoying.
> Anyhow, I noticed that there are now direct links with http 302 redirection
> towards a mirror, without the ugly selection page!
Is i
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:12:52AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Mo den 16. Jun 2008 um 6:25 schrieb Martin Pitt:
very poor code quality
That might be. But that's a problem of many gnome applications.
To be quite honest, I've seen the code for esd, and it is terrible.
In fact, worse than al
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
>
> http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
>
> Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
Thanks, this avoids the group_id search, so the audacity case can be trimmed to:
ve
I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
Downside is the extra redirects (sf->sourceforge, files->showfiles.php).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hi,
we have had a little trouble with our sf redirector a while back (i.e. the
sf mirror was down) and it is really annoying.
Anyhow, I noticed that there are now direct links with http 302 redirection
towards a mirror, without the ugly selection page!
example: [not wrapped at 80 columns, sorry]
Le mardi 17 juin 2008 à 14:06 +0100, Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
> OSS: Works well.
> OSS<-ESD: Works well too.
> ALSA: The problems above.
> ALSA<-ESD: I never really tested.
Last time I checked, libesd-alsa0 was still completely unusable (well,
except for some weird kind of sound-based torture).
--
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Martin Pitt wrote:
> That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver
> instead of the ALSA one? I can really not imagine how esound on top of
> a broken ALSA driver would sound better than just using the ALSA
> output directly?
It might normalize which sa
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 14:06 +0100]:
> > The alternative to esound is not really ALSA, but rather pulseaudio.
>
> Is pulsaudio supported by applications like wine for example? Do
> pulsaudio work on top of OSS?
pulseaudio provides an esound ABI compatibility layer, thus it's a
drop-in replaceme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Martin,
Am Di den 17. Jun 2008 um 11:50 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 10:12 +0100]:
> > I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
> > ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not that good than wit
Hi Klaus,
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 10:12 +0100]:
> I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
> ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not that good than with OSS
> direct but it is ok.)
Hm, that rather sounds like for your card the OSS driver is much
better than t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am Mo den 16. Jun 2008 um 6:25 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> esound should *so much* die completely. It has very poor sound quality
I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 483179 PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
Bug#483179: PTS: please *do not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
Changed Bug title to `PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page' from
`PTS: please *do not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#483179: reopen 483179, PTS: please do *not* link to
Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
has caused the Debian Bug report #483179,
regarding PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
to be m
16 matches
Mail list logo
