Bug#1107620: vcswatch: e2fsprogs: repository blocked even though it is nowhere near 500MiB

2025-08-16 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: tag -1 patch Hi! On Mon, 2025-08-11 at 01:51:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > I was looking at this again just now, and I think the subsequent git > fetches are causing the problem. On my server the dpkg.git repo is > 180 MiB (and I've not run «git gc --aggressive» for a while. > > Tryi

Processed: Re: Bug#1107620: vcswatch: e2fsprogs: repository blocked even though it is nowhere near 500MiB

2025-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1107620 [qa.debian.org] vcswatch: e2fsprogs: repository blocked even though it is nowhere near 500MiB Added tag(s) patch. -- 1107620: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107620 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o

Bug#1110828: linux: wrong stable version at tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux

2025-08-16 Thread Tobias Köck
Ok, thanks for checking. On 8/16/2025 2:16 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello, On Sat, 16 Aug 2025, Tobias Köck wrote: is it right, that the actual stable/trixie backports aren't listed at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux on the versions table? AFAIK linux is not yet in trixie-backports. I

Bug#1110832: marked as done (qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of OldStable)

2025-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:38:12 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1110832: qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of OldStable has caused the Debian Bug report #1110832, regarding qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of Ol

Bug#1111251: marked as done (DDPO: bookworm-backports are shown in the stable (trixie) column)

2025-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:38:12 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1110832: qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of OldStable has caused the Debian Bug report #1110832, regarding DDPO: bookworm-backports are shown in the stable (trixie) column to

Bug#1110828: linux: wrong stable version at tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux

2025-08-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Sat, 16 Aug 2025, Tobias Köck wrote: > is it right, that the actual stable/trixie backports aren't listed at > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux > on the versions table? AFAIK linux is not yet in trixie-backports. I looked yesterday and trixie-backports was still empty. Cheers, --

Bug#1110828: linux: wrong stable version at tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux

2025-08-16 Thread Tobias Köck
Hi Raphael, is it right, that the actual stable/trixie backports aren't listed at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux on the versions table? Greetings Tobias On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 08:19:12 +0200 Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello, On Mon, 11 Aug 2025, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Not a src:linux

Bug#1110832: qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of OldStable

2025-08-16 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Looking at the DDPO code in the qa repo it seems that data/ddpo/extract_incoming.pl only inserts bpo: records, wml/developer.wml shows oldstable backports for oldstable-bpo: records but nothing seems to create those. I suspect that manual intervention is required to rotate the bpo: records (del

Processed: merging 1110832 1111251

2025-08-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 1110832 251 Bug #1110832 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of OldStable Bug #251 [qa.debian.org] DDPO: bookworm-backports are shown in the stable (trixie) column Merged 1110832 251 >