Hi,
On 15-06-2024 11:38 p.m., Colin Watson wrote:
This was fixed by transaction 4.0-2, and it looks like either you
cancelled your upload or it was automatically dropped from the DELAYED
queue.
I cancelled my upload once I spotted 4.0-2.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Source: transaction
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.0-1
X-Debugs-CC: alexandre.deti...@gmail.com
Tags: sid trixie pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync
Source: gnome-shell-mailnag
Version: 40.0-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 40.0-7
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: pmacct
Version: 1.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.7.8-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Boyuan Yang
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable
Source: pyocd
Version: 0.13.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.36.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Alexandre Detiste
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: zope.proxy
Version: 4.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.1-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: gpsim-doc
Version: 0.22.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.22.0-3
X-Debbugs-CC: b...@debian.org
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: adequate
Version: 0.15.7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on all
architectures but amd64. Can you please investigate the situation and
fix it? I copied some of the
Hi Markus,
On 25-05-2023 23:47, Markus Koschany wrote:
Since I could not find a targeted fix I decided to remove the dependency on
rhino 1.7.14 and embedded rhino 1.7.7.2 instead, the last version that worked
well for closure-compiler.
I have rebuilt all reverse-dependencies and this would
Source: xchain
Version: 1.0.1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of the output
at
Source: zc.buildout
Version: 2.13.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm-ignore
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of the output
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi Bastian, Guilhem,
On 16-03-2023 13:44, Paul Gevers wrote:
cryptsetup will need to migrate to mitigate the time bomb.
Ack.
As I already mentioned on this or some related bug, I would find it
nice for #1014110 to be fixed in bookworm (threaded argon2 executable
Hi,
[@aurel32, glibc question at the bottom]
On 16-03-2023 11:57, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 16.03.23 um 09:13 schrieb Paul Gevers:
I'm not 100% sure I parse that sentence as you intended, so let me ask
explicitly: if we binNMU (now or in the future) src:argon2 version
0~20171227-0.3
Hi Guilhem,
On 16-03-2023 14:31, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
cryptsetup can only migrate when argon2 migrates,
I see that in the excuse page now but don't understand the reason why,
It took me a while and the help of colleagues, but it's
libcryptsetup12-udeb that has:
Depends: libargon2-1-udeb
Hi all,
On 15-03-2023 23:28, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 22:43:31 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
Am 15.03.23 um 22:39 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Do I understand correctly that:
1) argon2 in testing isn't affected
2) this bug isn't solved yet, despite the closure?
3) the issue
Hi,
[Release Team here]
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:42:56 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 05:10:41 +0100 Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Ah no my bad, the changelog entry is probably incorrect and the
> cryptsetup-initramfs breakage is caused by the recent libargon2 upload
> indeed, but
Source: x-loader
Version: 1.5.1+git20110715+fca7cd2-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.5.1+git20110715+fca7cd2-3
X-Debbugs-CC: Marcos Talau
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1026364
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release
Control: reassign -1 python3-nose
Control: tags -1 ftbfs patch pending upstream
Control: tags -1 - bookworm sid
Control: merge 1024235 -1
Control: affects -1 src:python-bayespy
Hi Håvard,
On 01-12-2022 19:16, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/nose/util.py", line
Source: zope.exceptions
Version: 4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.11
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainer(s),
We are in the transition of adding
Source: python-bayespy
Version: 0.5.22-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.11
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainer(s),
We are in the transition of adding
Source: guilt
Version: 0.36-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of guilt fails in testing
when that
Source: git-remote-hg
Version: 1.0.3.2~ds-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: g...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:git
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of git the autopkgtest of git-remote-hg fails in
Source: libowfat
Version: 0.30-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.32-3
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1014120
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: poc-streamer
Version: 0.4.2-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timeout
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package because it was
showing up on our "slow" page [1]. I noticed that there were several
runs that took
Package: dradio
Version: 3.8-2
Tags: sid bookworm
Severity: serious
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4
Control: reassign -2 qwinff 0.2.1+git20201215-1
Control: reassign -3 vdr-plugin-mp3 0.10.4-2
Control: reassign -4 videotrans 1.6.1-8
Dear maintainer,
Your package Depends on mplayer, which currently
Source: directfb
Version: 1.7.7-9
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: Andreas Beckmann
Control: close -1 1.7.7-10
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s), Andreas,
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Hi,
On 25-05-2022 22:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
While not having figured out where the bug exactly lies (I mean, which
lines of code), I think it's important to note that the
src:nvidia-settings (in main) is building a bin:nvidia-settings in
contrib. This is allowed by policy, but I think
Control: user qa.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 udd.debian.org
Hi Simon,
On 19-05-2022 13:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
dkms and nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470 currently have RC bug #1010884
triggering autoremovals (it was closed today, so maybe it will cease
to be
relevant soon).
Turns out
Package: qa.debian.org
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
On 21-05-2022 10:00, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
If you're doing this kind of filing, perhaps also send an email to
maintainers?
Yes, I should. But sometimes I forget that context gets lost, most often
I
Source: python-svg.path
Version: 6.0-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: by...@debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of python-svg.path the autopkgtest of
python-svg.path fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the
Dear Boyuan,
On 25-04-2022 20:44, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
+unar (1.10.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Orphan the package (take over package maintenance) via
+ITS process. (Closes: #1008569)
I maybe wrong but I was wondering if this is correct.
Section 5.12 in Debian's
Source: zope.testing
Version: 4.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.10
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainer(s),
We are in the transition of making python3.10
Source: httpbin
Version: 0.5.0+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.7.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Hi Eriberto,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto wrote:
> ow, Marcos will package the new upstream
> release and he will fix this mistake. In a final action, he will send
> a SPU to fix a specific issue.
Please be aware that grepmail will be removed from testing in 7 days if
the issue
Hi Eriberto,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto wrote:
> Thanks a lot Paul.
Please be aware that in the BTS bug submitters normally don't get mails
to the bugs they submit (unless they are subscribed). It's coincidence
that I see your message.
> Really, in our machines the package is
Source: grepmail
X-Debbugs-Cc: mar...@talau.info, eribe...@debian.org
Version: 5.3104-1
Severity: serious
Justification: RC policy
Dear Marcos, Joao,
I appreciate your attention to the orphaned package grepmail and the
fact that you try to save it from removal from testing, but in the
process
Source: golang-github-siddontang-go-snappy
Version: 0.0~git20140704.0.d8f7bb8-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0~git20140704.0.d8f7bb8-6
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The
Source: golang-github-go-xorm-builder
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3.3-3
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are
Source: httpbin
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of httpbin the autopkgtest of httpbin fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary
Source: grepmail
Version: 5.3104-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.3104-2
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between
Source: golang-github-go-macaron-i18n
Version: 0.0~git20160612.0.ef57533-7
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0~git20160612.0.ef57533-8
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release
Source: aspell-hr
Version: 0.51-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.51-6
X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: xdemorse
Version: 3.6.4-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of xdemorse the autopkgtest of xdemorse fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with
Hi all,
For documentation, I log our IRC conversation here.
[20:24:27] elbrus et al: just in case you have already seen
santiago_ 's email: what's your thought on #959022
[20:24:38] [zwiebelbot] Debian#959022: cgroup-tools: does not work in
cgroup2 / unified hierarchy -
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:28:06 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> shoogle has an autopkgtest, great. However, on i386 it fails more often
^^^ oops, that's what you get for reusing an old mail.
> I copied the output at the bottom of this report. Can you please look
> into it and make
Source: 9base
Version: 1:6-10
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
shoogle has an autopkgtest, great. However, on i386 it fails more often
than it passes [1].
Because the unstable-to-testing migration
Hi Mike,
All bugs have caused the packages to be on the list for autoremoval. It
seems there is one bug to be filed still, can you please do that?
Paul
elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R --suite testing libappindicator
Will remove the following packages from testing:
Hi Mike,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:06:59 + Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> >> If you want to get this done for bullseye, please upgrade these bugs to
> >> serious. Autoremovals will take care of some of the packages. The rest will
> >> need manual fixes.
> >
> > I haven't done that. I think the severity
Source: splint
Version: 1:3.1.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:3.1.2+dfsg-2
X-Debbugs-CC: la...@debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers
Source: link-grammar
Version: 5.7.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 5.8.0-1
X-Debbugs-CC: Masayuki Hatta
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are
Source: xoreos-tools
Version: 0.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.0.5-2
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and
Source: pwget
Version: 2016.1019+git75c6e3e-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2016.1019+git75c6e3e-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 961456
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers
Source: gsutil
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.1-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 961381
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync
Source: wav2cdr
Version: 2.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.3.4-3
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 958578
X-Debbugs-CC: eribe...@debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now
Source: odt2txt
Version: 0.5-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package odt2txt, great.
However, it fails. Currently this failure is blocking the
Source: idle3-tools
Version: 0.9.1-4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, leandrora...@debxp.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of idle3-tools the autopkgtest of idle3-tools fails
in testing when that
Source: pwget
Version: 2016.1019+git75c6e3e-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, elimar.henri...@yahoo.com.br
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of pwget the autopkgtest of pwget fails in testing
when that
Source: ngetty
Version: 1.1-5
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, guilherme@gmail.com
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of ngetty the autopkgtest of ngetty fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with
Source: gsutil
Version: 3.1-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, leandrora...@debxp.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
You recently added an autopkgtest to your package gsutil, great.
However, it fails. Currently this failure
Source: pev
Version: 0.80-4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package pev has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails. Can you
please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied some of
Source: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Version: 0.3-6
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.3-8
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 958224
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
Source: wav2cdr
Version: 2.3.4-3
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of wav2cdr you added an autopkgtest, great. However
it fails on arm64. I copied some of the output at the
Source: libpam-alreadyloggedin
Version: 0.3-8
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of libpam-alreadyloggedin the autopkgtest of
libpam-alreadyloggedin fails in testing when that
Hi Andreas,
On 16-04-2020 10:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky).
>
> H, what exactly means "superficial".
Please read the documentation:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/raw/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst
> Are all those
>
Hi Andreas,
On 15-04-2020 22:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> autodep8-python3 PASS (superficial)
superficial is translated to neutral. As is FAIL (flaky).
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
On 09-04-2020 22:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> valid_keys = ( 'run_id',
> # 'created_at', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
> # 'updated_at', # Paul Gevers: should be ignored
>'suite',
>
Hi Andreas,
On 01-04-2020 15:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
> If this information is really missing (and I did not just missed it
> inside the current UDD) where is the best source to parse metadata to
> fetch this information into UDD?
It depends what you look for. If you're concerned about failures
Source: dosage
Version: 2.15-2
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 2.15-3
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and
reassign -9 squirrel3 3.1-7
reassign -10 ubuntu-packaging-guide 1.0.1
reassign -11 yade 2019.01a-2
thanks
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:26:28 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid bullseye
>
> Recently the texlive-base package has stopped building the transitional
>
Hi Helmut,
[Adding the debian-ci team into the discussion]
On 18-02-2019 08:06, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>> autopkgtest [00:11:07]: test defconfig: [---
>> 2019-02-16 00:11:07: (configfile.c.1599) server.upload-dirs doesn't
>> exist: /var/cache/lighttpd/uploads
>> 2019-02-16
Source: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.53-2
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of lighttpd the autopkgtest of lighttpd fails in
testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of
lighttpd from
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 08:28:24 + "M. Zhou" wrote:
> Please display CI status for packages in contrib/non-free sections.
>
> For example, ci.d.o keeps running autopkgtest for zfs-linux and
> intel-mkl on Debian testing, but the result is not displayed on my DDPO
> page[1].
>
>
Source: pygresql
Version: 1:5.0.6-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of python3-defaults the autopkgtest of pygresql
fails in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages
of
Control: tags -1 ftbfs
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: retitle -1 pytest-localserver: FTBFS & autopkgtest regression
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 11:52:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of python3-defaults the autopkgtest of
> pytest-localserver fails in te
Source: pytest-localserver
Version: 0.3.7-2
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults
[X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org,
python3-defau...@packages.debian.org]
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of python3-defaults the
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Severity: wishlist
Owner: elb...@debian.org
Hi Raphael,
On 13-09-18 09:15, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 12-09-18 18:35, Niels
Hi
On 12-09-18 18:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
> We should probably have *some* marker in tracker for this case.
I think tracker is just slow at picking up new packages for excuses.
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-cran-snakecase should always
up-to-date within the hour.
Paul
Sending again to the new bug.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Bug#876197: Removed package(s) from unstable
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:01:35 +0200
From: Paul Gevers
To: Helio Loureiro
CC: Eriberto Mota
Dear Helio,
On 11-06-18 14:45, Helio Loureiro wrote:
> Is possible to k
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Multiple of my packages do not have a proper URL to watch. Lintian suggest to
add a watch file with comments, and uscan handles those gracefully. UDD
turns them into an
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The Debian Maintainer Dashboard at ¹ has a link for the accessibility team TODO
list. However, we, the accessibility team, are migrating the maintainer address
in our
Ping...
As a QA maintained package which is not going into the upcoming release
with a license issue open for 1.5 years, shouldn't this package be
removed from Debian?
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Raphaël
On 06-12-16 09:23, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2016, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I (elbrus) just tried to use the "Modify keywords" button on my subscription
>> page to reduce the list to only bts for the motif package. After every "Save
>
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 2016-12-05
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I (elbrus) just tried to use the "Modify keywords" button on my subscription
page to reduce the list to only bts for the motif package. After every "Save
changes" the list was
Hi all,
I just wanted to let you know that yesterday I uploaded a much improved
dbconfig-common package to unstable on which some of your packages
depend (see dd-list output below). I took over ownership of this package
some time ago from Sean Finney. Although I have extended the set of
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I tried to go from https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=elbrus%40debian.org
to my Dashboard via the link provided at the top of the page, however
that failed because the link is not correct.
The link on
On 07-11-14 15:23, Holger Levsen wrote:
the log says:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
fp-units-multimedia : Depends: fp-units-multimedia-2.6.0 (= 2.6.0-9) but it
is not going to be installed
fpc-2.6.0 : Depends: fp-units-multimedia-2.6.0 (= 2.6.0-9) but it is not
going
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
My package cacti has a release in old-lts. Under versions [1] there is a link
to [2], which gives the following error:
two or more packages specified (cacti squeeze-lts).
I don't know what (if it exist)
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for supporting feeds for the TODO list on https://udd.debian.org/dmd/.
However, I constantly get new feeds because on every pull the
pubdate of
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I recently added a testsuite to my package winff, which now fails on
it [1]. It would be great if that would be visible on the pts [2].
[1] http://ci.debian.net/#package/winff
[2]
On 10-09-13 19:21, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
thanks alot for your info. Unfortunately the motif license is not the
only hurdle to put cluster3 into main.
Clear.
Anyway, if I understand you right, I just have to reupload the package
to get everything straight with the motif update (so no need
Control: reassign -1 motif
On 15-08-13 01:56, G.raud wrote:
Having the OpenMotif manual pages in a separate package libmotif-doc instead
of
inside libmotif-dev would allow this new package not to conflict with any
Lesstif
packages; thus it would be possible to have some Motif manual pages
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 emacspeak loops infinite on specific directory
Hi Tim,
Sorry for taking so long to respond to this bug, but the package
emacspeak was orphaned and just got a new maintainer.
On 24-02-07 12:04, Romain Francoise wrote:
I believe that this is a bug in
On 09-06-13 11:05, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 04-06-13 08:31, Julien Cristau wrote:
Do we know how many of the lesstif2 reverse dependencies are libraries
whose ABI would change if rebuilt with motif instead?
No, but I can try to find out. The original idea of lesstif was to be a
binary
Hi Graham,
[Side note: maybe we can stop using the @packages.debian.org address, I
don't think anybody else is listening.]
On 25-05-13 21:08, Graham Inggs wrote:
Thanks for uploading!
Thank you for the nice cooperation so far, it has been a pleasure.
I will file the bugs against the reverse
Hi Graham,
Congratulations...
Now that we have motif in Debian/main, I would like to fix the fact that
motif FTBFS on non-linux systems. That is needed if we want to replace
lesstif2 as that is now available on more Debian platforms than motif.
I think I know where it goes wrong (I have to
Hmm,
Maybe I was too quick, although I don't understand why it works now, but
kfreebsd now builds with motif 2.3.4, where it didn't build with
openmotif 2.3.3.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=motifsuite=sid
Paul
On 25-05-13 17:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Graham
[Summary of previous mails: we are discussing how/when to move openmotif
to motif].
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/5/22 Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org:
Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
Will keep you updated.
I don't think we need
Hi Luca,
On 23-05-13 08:43, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/5/22 Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org:
Ok. Then we just have to wait until the RT grants us a transition slot.
Will keep you updated.
I don't think we need it for openmotif - motif, as long as motif is
ABI-compatible with openmotf.
After
On 20-05-13 11:55, Luca Falavigna wrote:
I just checked, openmotif has only two rdeps, all of them in non-free,
and just for i386 and amd64 architectures. I don't think removing
openmotif from non-free and immediately accepting motif in main would
cause a lot of trouble for those two packages,
Hi Luca,
[What would be the appropriate mail-list or bug-tracker for this
discussion to happen in the open? Should I add it to the transition bug?]
On 20-05-13 09:03, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/5/18 Paul Gevers elb...@debian.org:
While we are waiting for the release team to respond to my
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
