Re: Bug#539749: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-24 Thread Davide G. M. Salvetti
fant == Frank Küster [2009-8-21] fant Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote: fant But I also think that your style of working is not encouraging for fant collaborators. You actually *do* accept patches, sometimes as-is, fant sometimes you take them as inspiration, but solve the issue

Re: Bug#539749: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-20 Thread Frank Küster
Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote: The package is comaintained, and qualified people are always welcome (Frank Küster being the most prominent, looking to past history). One who has not much time to spend ATM, though. And I must admit that your packaging style is a hindrance, too:

Re: Bug#539749: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-20 Thread Frank Küster
Davide G. M. Salvetti sa...@debian.org wrote: AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-20] AT Your arguing actually was: DGMS ... you can start by studying how the software DGMS is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches. AT as a response to a patch which was provided inside

Re: Bug#539749: Time for a new maintainer for Auctex?

2009-08-20 Thread Frank Küster
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote: patches myself and build local packages if I want to use recent high popcon software like Emacs 23 who are not even be able to say sorry for not beeing active to potential helpers. What I was considering myself (years ago) was to create a package