Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/11/2008):
Except for qtparted the popcon numbers are all pretty low.
I just had a very quick look upstream, and last activity seems to have
happened in 2004.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (01/11/2008):
Except for qtparted the popcon numbers are all pretty low.
I just had a very quick look upstream, and last activity seems to have
happened in 2004.
Upstream SVN had
retitle 501946 ITA: php-openid -- php openid library
thx
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 02:43:10PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Raphael Geissert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
php-openid - #501946
I'm not sure if this one should be removed. There's still the openid
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
retitle 501946 ITA: php-openid -- php openid library
thx
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 02:43:10PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Raphael Geissert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
php-openid - #501946
I'm not sure if this one should be removed.
Re: Frank Lichtenheld 2008-07-20 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
(and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
testing) before lenny's release. Including a
Christoph Berg wrote:
Joey had concerns against the removal of sparkline-php in July. Popcon
lists 5 installations, so I'd propose to remove it. Joey?
It would make ikiwiki buggy by causing it to suggest a package
that is not in the distribution, and by removing one of its features.
--
see
Hi Cristoph,
Christoph Berg wrote:
Hi,
I intend to file a new round of removal requests from testing for
packages that were not part of etch and are orphaned:
[...]
php-openid - #501946
I'm not sure if this one should be removed. There's still the openid momentum
and there is (are?)
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Raphael Geissert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
php-openid - #501946
I'm not sure if this one should be removed. There's still the openid momentum
and there is (are?) some packages in mentors that depend on it.
Perhaps the people who are packaging stuff that depends
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've reassigned the bugs to ftp.debian.org for packages that should be
removed from Debian completly. I would suggest the following removals
from testing at this point:
# #491892: RoQA; NPOASR, orphaned
remove hg-buildpackage/1.0.4.1
# #491891:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 04:32:29PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# #491892: RoQA; NPOASR, orphaned
remove hg-buildpackage/1.0.4.1
# #491891: RoQA; NPOASR, orphaned
remove krecordmydesktop/0.1~alpha1+debian-2
# #491900: RoQA; NPOASR,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:34:30PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
(and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
I think it would be a good
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=npolsr-cleanup;[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Let me see if I got it right:
You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
* is not in etch (because it was not
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 02:20:58AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:37:46AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
That is indeed a true statement, but I'm unsure what point you're trying
to make in the context of this discussion.
Care to elaborate?
Sure. The point I am
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
(and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
testing) before lenny's
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
(and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Let me see if I got it right:
You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
* is not in etch (because it was not uploaded in time for etch),
* is orphaned (...); and because
* it has a low popcon
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote:
You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
[...]
* is orphaned (...); and because
[...]
And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped
in lenny? Is that right?
Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care
Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote:
You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
[...]
* is orphaned (...); and because
[...]
And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being
shipped in lenny? Is that right?
Yes. It's
Raphael Geissert wrote:
DFSG:
* Social Contract
4. Our priorities are our users and free software
We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
community. We will place their interests first in our priorities.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:50:10PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Holger Levsen wrote:
Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care about the package, please adopt it.
Thanks.
I do care about the package but as a spare user, not as a maintainer; I
won't put my name on a package I really won't
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people
who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care
of it?
The commitment for maintaining a package should be greater than will do
a
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:44:12AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people
who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care
of it?
The
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:37:46AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
That is indeed a true statement, but I'm unsure what point you're trying
to make in the context of this discussion.
Care to elaborate?
Sure. The point I am trying to make is that encouraging someone to
adopt a package when
Hi.
I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
(and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
testing) before lenny's release. Including a package in a stable release
gives it much more weight
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 20 juillet 2008, vers 16:45,
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
libsvg: popcon 602/8/35/4/555, no rdepends (library)
- remove
There is no bug in it and it seems up-to-date.
--
panic (No CPUs found. System halted.\n);
2.4.3
Hi Frank,
On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:45, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
testing) before lenny's release.
[..]
Comments, objections?
Looks good to me (to remove as suggested), thanks for the work! For those
packages in testing,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 20 juillet 2008, vers 16:45,
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
libsvg: popcon 602/8/35/4/555, no rdepends (library)
- remove
There is no bug in it and it seems
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:31:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:45, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
testing) before lenny's release.
[..]
Comments, objections?
Looks good to me (to remove as
28 matches
Mail list logo
