Bug#1081461: marked as done (vcswatch: fails to query salsa, impacts DDPO and tracker.d.o)

2024-09-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:02:56 +0200 with message-id <9dabe50827c31a536498a36ac8dee147776dc097.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: vcswatch: fails to query salsa, impacts DDPO and tracker.d.o has caused the Debian Bug report #1081461, regarding vcswatch: fails to query

Bug#1081461: vcswatch: fails to query salsa, impacts DDPO and tracker.d.o

2024-09-11 Thread Sven Geuer
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Dear Maintainer, vcswatch is failing to query salsa.d.o for several days by now. Here is, e.g., the error message for the package vpnc: https://salsa.debian.org/api/v4/projects/pkg-security-team%2Fvpnc API request failed: 401 Unauthorized at

vcswatch: 401 unauthorized with Salsa

2024-09-03 Thread Leandro Cunha
Hi, The following error is occurring. See https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=celluloid -- Cheers, Leandro Cunha signature.asc Description: Binary data

vcswatch - how to fix Error: fatal: missing blob object '...'

2024-08-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi! I think I've broken vcswatch :( I was updating jupyter-server-mathjax, but probably messed up a commit along the line. Anyway, somehow, vcswatch now says: Error: fatal: missing blob object 'ae757feb8182c5c3d2934dee63504ea0a87f02ac' error: remote did not send all neces

Bug#1072498: qa.debian.org: vcswatch fails to update dpkg repo due to size limit

2024-06-02 Thread Guillem Jover
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! It seems vcswatch is having some issues with the dpkg git repo, and it complains that it is too big, exceeding 500 MiB. From https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=dpkg: ,-- ERROR: Git: https://git.dpkg.org/git/dpkg/dpkg.git Branch: main Path

Bug#1069995: VCSWatch: underlaying system doesn't support TLS1.3

2024-04-28 Thread Daniel Baumann
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, I've switched off TLS1.2 on my git server (to see what would be brocken), one of them is VCSWatch: Error: fatal: unable to access 'https://git.progress-linux.org/users/daniel.baumann/debian/packages/aio-eapi/': gnutls_handshake(

Bug#1067217: marked as done (qa.debian.org: vcswatch fails with "remote: warning: unable to find all commit-graph files")

2024-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:28:38 + with message-id <65fc19e6a9c68_20a82994c-...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1067217 fixed in qa.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1067217, regarding qa.debian.org: vcswatch fails with "remote: warning: unable to find

Bug#1067217: qa.debian.org: vcswatch fails with "remote: warning: unable to find all commit-graph files"

2024-03-20 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal This does not seem to be a transient error: Error: remote: warning: unable to find all commit-graph files https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=acpi-call https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=nvidia-support Andreas

Bug#1032623: marked as done (vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size)

2024-03-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 14:34:39 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > It looks like this broke for remotes that do not support filtering > > (yet?). The attached completely untested patch might make this work > > again. Affecting at least git.hadrons.org and git.dpkg.org, but there > > might be othe

Bug#1032623: marked as done (vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size)

2024-03-07 Thread Christoph Berg
> It looks like this broke for remotes that do not support filtering > (yet?). The attached completely untested patch might make this work > again. Affecting at least git.hadrons.org and git.dpkg.org, but there > might be others too. Thanks for spotting that, the patch seems to work. Re-running t

Bug#1032623: marked as done (vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size)

2024-03-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2024-03-06 at 14:15:03 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > vcswatch: Use --filter blob:none > > Required blobs (changelog, control, upstream metadata) are fetched by > git on demand.

Re: Vcswatch scanning broken? (no space left on space)

2024-03-06 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 3/7/24 3:50 AM, Boyuan Yang wrote: I am not sure where vcswatch is running on quantz, see: https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi search for "qa" in the Description column. , but obviously the machine now has a full disk that makes vcswatch fail: See https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bi

Vcswatch scanning broken? (no space left on space)

2024-03-06 Thread Boyuan Yang
Hi, I am not sure where vcswatch is running on, but obviously the machine now has a full disk that makes vcswatch fail: See https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=rspamd : Last scan: 2024-03-03 20:52:07+00 Error: fatal: Unable to create '/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/r/r

Bug#1032623: marked as done (vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size)

2024-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 06 Mar 2024 14:13:20 + with message-id <65e87a00c054a_2433439607...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1032623 fixed in qa.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1032623, regarding vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size to be marked as do

Bug#1029068: vcswatch: fails to run due to full file system.

2024-03-03 Thread Ricardo Mones
Package: qa.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #1029068 Hi, Just noticed at least one of my packages¹ got also hit by this one: Error: fatal: Unable to create temporary file '/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/c/claws-mail/objects/pack/tmp_idx_XX': No space left on device fatal:

Bug#1060115: marked as done (vcswatch: look for changelog in debian/experimental branch)

2024-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 06 Jan 2024 22:31:14 + with message-id <6599d4b262eb_59f94c-...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1060115 fixed in qa.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1060115, regarding vcswatch: look for changelog in debian/experimental branch to be marked as done.

Bug#1060115: vcswatch: look for changelog in debian/experimental branch

2024-01-06 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Martin > + my @branch_list = qw(HEAD debian debian/master debian/sid > debian/latest debian/experimental master); Applied, thanks! Christoph

Bug#1060115: vcswatch: look for changelog in debian/experimental branch

2024-01-05 Thread Martin
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@debian.org Useful for packages only in debian/experimental. diff --git a/data/vcswatch/vcswatch b/data/vcswatch/vcswatch index bb20d156..2d8491cc 100755 --- a/data/vcswatch/vcswatch +++ b/data/vcswatch/vcswatch @@ -330,7

Bug#1050657: marked as done (UDD/vcswatch importer: add support for ci_status, ci_url, merge_requests)

2023-09-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2023 00:10:20 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1050657: UDD/vcswatch importer: add support for ci_status, ci_url, merge_requests has caused the Debian Bug report #1050657, regarding UDD/vcswatch importer: add support for ci_status, ci_url

Bug#1050657: UDD/vcswatch importer: add support for ci_status, ci_url, merge_requests

2023-08-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, vcswatch knows about the last pipeline status, and the number of merge requests, in /srv/udd.debian.org/mirrors/qa.debian.org-vcswatch. See ci_url, ci_status, merge_requests. but UDD does not import that data. It

Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Gábor Németh > I see. > > > trycmd ('git', 'clone', '--quiet', '--bare', '--mirror', '--depth', > > '50', '--no-single-branch', '--template', '', $url, $pkgdir); > > > > depth=1 wouldn't work since we use "git describe". > > Wouldn't then adding [.., '--filter', 'blob:none', ..] suffice for t

Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-30 Thread Gábor Németh
I see. > trycmd ('git', 'clone', '--quiet', '--bare', '--mirror', '--depth', > '50', '--no-single-branch', '--template', '', $url, $pkgdir); > > depth=1 wouldn't work since we use "git describe". Wouldn't then adding [.., '--filter', 'blob:none', ..] suffice for the needs of vncwatch? BR, Gábor

Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Gábor Németh > and my question if this behavior can be changed on d.o side by doing > shallow / blobless `git clone`? Either of these only produces a 200MB > checkout for the package I'm working with. Hi Gábor, we are already doing that to some extent: trycmd ('git', 'clone', '--quiet', '--

Re: Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Diederik de Haas
and that issue should be resolved (asap). > Specifically on the kernel, vcswatch is of limited use anyway since > there are several packages using the repo, but only one of them > ("linux") contains a debian/changelog where the package name matches. > On "linux", I had the

Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
nning out of disk space several times in > the past years, and blacklisting the biggest repos helped a lot. > (There are some that are even > 4 GB.) Couldn't vcswatch move off quantz to a separate VM on Debian infra, or to a VM on AWS? Or maybe separate the control part (on quantz) an

Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Christoph Berg
t repos helped a lot. (There are some that are even > 4 GB.) Specifically on the kernel, vcswatch is of limited use anyway since there are several packages using the repo, but only one of them ("linux") contains a debian/changelog where the package name matches. On "linux",

Bug#1032623: vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
retitle 1032623 vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size thanks My understanding is that the restriction on 1Gb in size for repositories was recently introduced and is intentional (due to disk constraints on the host where vcswatch runs?).

Processed: vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1032623 vcswatch: should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size Bug #1032623 [qa.debian.org] lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size Changed Bug title to 'vcswatch: should not raise error o

Processed: Re: Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1032623 qa.debian.org Bug #1032623 [lintian-brush] lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size Bug reassigned from package 'lintian-brush' to 'qa.debian.org'. No longer marked as

Bug#1032623: lintian-brush: vcswatch should not raise error on repos > 1GiB in size

2023-03-10 Thread Diederik de Haas
re is a high-priority action needed item because vcswatch "Failed to analyze the VCS repository". The reason: "Repository size 1135554560 exceeds 1 GiB, blocking it" So I queried `udd` to see what it had to tell: udd=> select vcs, url, status, error from vcswatch

vcswatch: Failed to analyze the VCS repository as size is > 1GB

2023-02-12 Thread Diederik de Haas
Hi, On https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux I see a high-priority 'action needed' item triggered by vcswatch as it failed to analyse the VCS repository. But the kernel repo just happens to be big, so I highly doubt that anything could be done about it. I'm guessing that the 1G

Bug#1029068: vcswatch: fails to run due to full file system.

2023-01-17 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Dear Maintainer, the vcswatch service currently fails to run: "Error: fatal: Unable to create '/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/c/cm-super/shallow.lock': No space left on device" this hits a few of my git repositories. Please

Bug#1014473: vcswatch: track identity of committers of unuploaded commits

2022-08-11 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Thanks! It would indeed be great if we could also extract the authors into a proper JSON structure so downstream consumers like the janitor don't have to implement that themselves for each VCS type. On 8 August 2022 17:14:44 CEST, Christoph Berg wrote: >Re: To Jelmer Vernooij >> Does that work

Bug#1014473: vcswatch: track identity of committers of unuploaded commits

2022-08-08 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: To Jelmer Vernooij > Does that work? I guess we could try extracting the authors > (committers?) into a proper json structure if that helps. > > Helmut was approaching me about extracting even more fields from git, > Maintainer, Uploaders, Homepage, updated Vcs info, debian/watch, and > expose

Bug#1016203: marked as done (vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14))

2022-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2022 14:49:17 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016203: vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14) has caused the Debian Bug report #1016203, regarding vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14) to be marked as done. This means

Processed: Re: vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14)

2022-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #1016203 [qa.debian.org] vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14) Added tag(s) patch. -- 1016203: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1016203: vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14)

2022-07-29 Thread Gioele Barabucci
Control: tags -1 + patch A patch to fix this problem can be found at https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/-/merge_requests/38 -- Gioele Barabucci

Bug#1016203: vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14)

2022-07-29 Thread Gioele Barabucci
Package: qa.debian.org Dear vcswatch maintainers, could you please add support for repositories that use `debian/latest` as the branch for their packaging work? DEP-14 states: > In Debian this means that uploads to unstable and experimental should > be prepared either in the `debian/

Bug#1014473: vcswatch: track identity of committers of unuploaded commits

2022-07-22 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Jelmer Vernooij > It would be great if vcswatch could track who the committers were of the > commits have not yet made it into the archive. Hi Jelmer, sorry for the latish reply. We are already extracting the not-yet-uploaded part of the git log which is part of https://qa.debian.or

Bug#1014473: vcswatch: track identity of committers of unuploaded commits

2022-07-06 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@debian.org It would be great if vcswatch could track who the committers were of the commits have not yet made it into the archive. I'm curious about this as a way to track the number of janitor commits that have not yet been upl

Bug#989531: marked as done (vcswatch: Error: fatal: dumb http transport does not support shallow capabilities)

2021-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:41:36 + with message-id <60cc6a507bd8f_4dd72ac6b0ac65c41...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#989531 fixed in qa.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #989531, regarding vcswatch: Error: fatal: dumb http transport does not support s

Bug#977174: marked as done (vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories)

2021-06-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Jun 2021 16:17:13 +0100 with message-id and subject line Implemented has caused the Debian Bug report #977174, regarding vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#989531: vcswatch: Error: fatal: dumb http transport does not support shallow capabilities

2021-06-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=campania and others have: Error: fatal: dumb http transport does not support shallow capabilities

Bug#977174: vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories

2020-12-17 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
changes to the packaging repository URLs. > Ah ok. > > > For salsa repositories specifically, it may be possible to improve the > > reponsiveness of vcswatch by installing a server-side hook that > > notifies vcswatch whenever a salsa repository has changed. > > That&#x

Bug#977174: vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories

2020-12-17 Thread Christoph Berg
ally, it may be possible to improve the > reponsiveness of vcswatch by installing a server-side hook that > notifies vcswatch whenever a salsa repository has changed. That's actually already in place. We can proxy that to you I think, and/or write the info to some place. See https://sa

Bug#977174: vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories

2020-12-17 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Jelmer Vernooij > > It would be great if vcswatch could call a webhook whenever a packaging > > repository changed. > currently repository information is extracted from the Sources files > in unstable

Bug#977174: vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories

2020-12-17 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Jelmer Vernooij > It would be great if vcswatch could call a webhook whenever a packaging > repository changed. Hi, currently repository information is extracted from the Sources files in unstable and experimental, i.e. vcswatch doesn't follow changes in Vcs-* inside the reposit

Bug#977174: vcswatch: web hook for changed repositories

2020-12-11 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist It would be great if vcswatch could call a webhook whenever a packaging repository changed. This could be triggered whenever repositories are found to be different at poll time, but e.g. for salsa this could be triggered by a server side hook (https

Processed: Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python-asteval Bug #959165 [qa.debian.org] udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'python-asteval'. Ignoring request to alte

Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: reassign -1 python-asteval Re: Rebecca N. Palmer 2020-04-30 > spyder, python-asteval and beignet don't have a cgit in Vcs-Git. Hence, > while I agree it's a bug that apertium-bel does, this alone doesn't explain > either of the above messages. Salsa was down for two days, you can speed

Processed: Re: Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 959165 -1 Bug #959165 [qa.debian.org] udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa Bug 959165 cloned as bug 959167 > reassign -1 apertium-bel Bug #959167 [qa.debian.org] udd vcswatch: 4

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > clone -1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign -1 qa.debian.org Bug #959165 [apertium-bel] udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa Bug reassigned from package 'apertium-be

Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: reassign -1 apertium-bel Re: Rebecca N. Palmer 2020-04-30 > Package: qa.debian.org > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > > Some packages' vcswatch pages have the error > > fatal: could not read Username for 'https://salsa.debian.or

Processed: Re: Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 apertium-bel Bug #959165 [qa.debian.org] udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'apertium-bel'. Ignoring request to alter found

Bug#959165: udd vcswatch: 429 "Retry later" or "could not read Username" from Salsa

2020-04-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Some packages' vcswatch pages have the error fatal: could not read Username for 'https://salsa.debian.org': No such device or address (e.g. apertium-bel, python-asteval) or remote: Retry later f

Bug#946024: vcswatch: track last commit sha

2019-12-02 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist For tools that rely on vcswatch to know what vcs repository to process, it would be great if vcswatch could store: * the latest revision (e.g. commit SHA for Git, revision number for SVN, etc) * When that revision was created -- System Information

Bug#934291: Extend qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch graphs to cover Salsa info

2019-08-10 Thread Patrice Duroux
the available result. Regards, Patrice On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:26:36 +0300 =?UTF-8?B?T3R0byBLZWvDpGzDpGluZW4=?= < o...@debian.org> wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > The page https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch currently lists stats > about what V

Bug#934291: Extend qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch graphs to cover Salsa info

2019-08-09 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist The page https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch currently lists stats about what VCS packages are using. Could you please extend this check to also include a graph on how many packages have 'salsa.debian.org' in their VCS field? This should

Processed: Re: Bug#912405: vcswatch cannot analyze repositories maintained on a branch

2018-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 gcc-8 Bug #912405 [qa.debian.org] vcswatch cannot analyze repositories maintained on a branch Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'gcc-8'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #912405 to the same values

Bug#912405: vcswatch cannot analyze repositories maintained on a branch

2018-10-31 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: reassign -1 gcc-8 Control: retitle -1 Use Vcs-Git: -b gcc-8-debian Re: Matthias Klose 2018-10-31 <9d472e23-3a14-a992-7467-0b9b7c32b...@ubuntu.com> > Package: qa.debian.org > > as seen on > https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=gcc-8 > vcswatch cannot

Bug#912405: vcswatch cannot analyze repositories maintained on a branch

2018-10-31 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: qa.debian.org as seen on https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=gcc-8 vcswatch cannot analyze repositories maintained on a branch

Bug#906663: marked as done (vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload")

2018-09-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <20180913075003.ga24...@home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload" has caused the Debian Bug report #906663, regarding vcswatch:

Bug#907458: qa.debian.org: bogus encoding of vcswatch

2018-08-28 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! I'm afraid that the tool that displays changelogs from git breaks non-ASCII characters. It's not a matter of web server configuration as http headers are ok: Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Seen on https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswat

Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload"

2018-08-20 Thread Marc Haber
x-y+1~unrel after uploading x-y? that's indeed nicer than a .0 version. > 2) only generate this changelog entry with the first change, i.e. > leave git unmodified until the first change happens. That would mean that all people committing would have to remember that. I don't thin

Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload"

2018-08-20 Thread Christoph Berg
emind that there's pending changes. I think this is the major issue here. It's a maintainer decision if pending changes warrant an upload, not an automated system's one. I don't think we can easily tell this case from various other edge cases apart in vcswatch. If there's a new changelog entry, or commits since the last tag, it needs to raise "NEW" or "UNREL". Christoph

Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload"

2018-08-19 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 08:48:02PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: Re: Marc Haber 2018-08-19 <153468174721.19286.15758469883614485339.report...@fan.zugschlus.de> > > I could work in a branch, but that would mean additional rules for team > > maintained packages which I'd rather avoid. I mean, there

Processed: Re: Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload"

2018-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 tracker.debian.org Bug #906663 [qa.debian.org] vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload" Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'tracker.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter

Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload"

2018-08-19 Thread Christoph Berg
Control: reassign -1 tracker.debian.org Re: Marc Haber 2018-08-19 <153468174721.19286.15758469883614485339.report...@fan.zugschlus.de> > vcswatch makes this "VCS has unreleased changes", which is correct. The > tracker, however, makes this "A new version is available

Bug#906663: vcswatch: should not flag an UNRELEASED changelog entry as "ready for upload"

2018-08-19 Thread Marc Haber
number. Please also note the UNRELEASED distribution and the NOT YET RELEASED changelog entry which will stay the top changelog entry until the package is eventually uploaded. vcswatch makes this "VCS has unreleased changes", which is correct. The tracker, however, makes this "A n

Bug#897625: marked as done (vcswatch: shallow clone error with dump http git transport)

2018-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2018 15:54:14 + with message-id <5b1bf826897d_3402ab695c990d471...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug #897625 in qa.debian.org fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #897625, regarding vcswatch: shallow clone error with dump http git transport to be marked a

Bug#897624: marked as done (vcswatch: no indication of where/how bugreports are to be sent)

2018-05-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 May 2018 19:01:28 + with message-id <5aef5108326ed_38c2ab250f970cc23...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug #897624 in qa.debian.org fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #897624, regarding vcswatch: no indication of where/how bugreports are to be sent to be mar

Bug#897624: vcswatch: no indication of where/how bugreports are to be sent

2018-05-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: vcswatch Individual vcswatch pages as linked from DDPO do not have any indication of where to report bugs to, e.g. https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=musescore-general-soundfont only shows “To report a problem

Bug#897625: vcswatch: shallow clone error with dump http git transport

2018-05-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: vcswatch https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=musescore-general-soundfont lists this error: Error: Cloning into bare repository '/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/m/musescore-general-soundfont'... f

Re: vcswatch shallow error

2018-05-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:18 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > a bug report against what? Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: vcswatch > There’s no indication where bugreports should go, except this list. Please file a second bug report about that :) -

Re: vcswatch shallow error

2018-04-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Paul, > > fatal: dumb http transport does not support shallow capabilities > > > > Just unshallow then ☺ > > Please file a bug about this so it isn't forgotten. a bug report against what? Surely not against myon… the page says: “To report a problem with the QA web site, e-mail debian-qa@list

Re: vcswatch shallow error

2018-04-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 5:57 AM, Thorsten Glaser > fatal: dumb http transport does not support shallow capabilities > > Just unshallow then ☺ Please file a bug about this so it isn't forgotten. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

vcswatch shallow error

2018-04-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=musescore-general-soundfont Error: Cloning into bare repository '/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/m/musescore-general-soundfont'... fatal: dumb http transport does not support shallow capabilities Just unshallow then ☺

Bug#784907: marked as done (vcswatch: Fails to parse Git HEAD if multiple branches point at HEAD)

2018-01-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:12:13 +0100 with message-id <20180119161213.ga1...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#784907: vcswatch: Fails to parse Git HEAD if multiple branches point at HEAD has caused the Debian Bug report #784907, regarding vcswatch: Fails to parse Git H

Bug#886334: marked as done (vcswatch: use the debian-branch specified in gbp.conf for Git)

2018-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:54:23 -0500 with message-id <20180104165423.y6r7orikuutd5...@zeta.ryanak.ca> and subject line Re: Bug#886334: vcswatch: use the debian-branch specified in gbp.conf for Git has caused the Debian Bug report #886334, regarding vcswatch: use the debian-

Processed: Re: Bug#886334: vcswatch: use the debian-branch specified in gbp.conf for Git

2018-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #886334 [qa.debian.org] vcswatch: use the debian-branch specified in gbp.conf for Git Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 886334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886334 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#886334: vcswatch: use the debian-branch specified in gbp.conf for Git

2018-01-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
erex sources specifies that the debian-branch is > vprerex, and this is the branch vcswatch should be checking. This would require unpacking the source package, something that clearly is very expensive to do for all packages in the archive, whereas Vcs-* fields are available in the package index.

Bug#886334: vcswatch: use the debian-branch specified in gbp.conf for Git

2018-01-04 Thread Ryan Kavanagh
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal For git repositories, vcswatch should check the configuration file debian/gbp.conf (if it exists) in the source package to determine what branch to use as its packaging branch. For example, vcswatch reports Error: changelog package prerex does not

vcswatch - owncloud-client - tags?

2017-12-07 Thread Sandro Knauß
Hey, currenty vcswatch is unhappy about the status for owncloud-client [0]. The issue is, that I pushed the current version to the experimental branch and vcswatch is not getting this. But I have made commen tags (debian/) for the versions in experimental, so vcswatch could detect them and be

Bug#773294: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service)

2017-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 3 Dec 2017 15:12:03 +0100 with message-id <20171203141203.ga8...@home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service has caused the Debian Bug report #773294, regarding tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-27 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
on=None/False for no compression) > - or the user relies on compression="auto" (default value) in which > case it should just rely on the filename extension that we should pass > along in some way. > > In the case of something retrieved through the web, it might be

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Adding tests afterwards is hard and you are likely to miss some important > > tests. And it's just not fun to code tests separately when you already > > have something working... it will be hard to stick to it in the long run. > > I agree on the

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 15:44 +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Would you like a QA link for each package? Yes, it acts as promotion for the service so more folks know about it. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > - either the user is explicit (compression="gzip" attribute, or > > compression=None/False for no compression) > > - or the user relies on compression="auto" (default value) in which > > case it should just rely on the filename extension that

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-22 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
iding no argument for compression. Which one would you prefer? > Also it seems to me that the correct API for generic decompression should > rely on getting a file object as input and providing a file object as > output... as that's what you want to be able to process really big files &

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-22 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
ys.fr/pkg/python-aiosmtpd > > This seems to be missing the QA link, but the patch you provided > doesn't seem to conditionalise on the status and the package is > definitely present within the vcswatch data. I only show QA link when status is not OK. So no QA there. Would you like

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
n some way. In the case of something retrieved through the web, it might be interesting to check the Content-Type to infer the compression too: $ HEAD https://qa.debian.org/data/vcswatch/vcswatch.json.gz |grep Content-Type Content-Type: application/x-gzip X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff (But it m

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-21 Thread Paul Wise
s definitely present within the vcswatch data. > Please, feel free to review and comment the patch. Great, some minor comments below. > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Adds compression utilities for future use with caches Would it be a good idea to add xz in addition to or instead of bzip2? I'm s

Bug#773294: tracker.debian.org: add support for the vcswatch service

2017-11-21 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Other compressions might come when +useful. +:type compression: bool :returns: The bytes representation of the resource found at the given url :rtype: bytes + """ if cache is None: cache_directory_path = settings.DISTRO_TRACKER_CACHE_DIRECTOR

Re: vcswatch vs. experimental distribution

2017-08-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 03:37:37PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Although I have to admit the VCS-{Browser,Git} headers > in debian/control on experimental were not changed. > Could this be a cause? Yes, that's exactly the cause. If HEAD does not match what is uploaded then you should be changi

vcswatch vs. experimental distribution

2017-08-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=xrdp shows this as behind, although the master branch and related tags are up-to-date wrt. the package in sid, and the experimental branch and tags are up-to-date wrt. the package in experimental. Is this a bug? Although I have to admit the VCS

Q: How to set branch for VcsWatch?

2017-07-21 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Could anyone tell me how to change branch for VcsWatch? For example, https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=birdfont says > Branch: master > Path: debian/changelog How do I change Branch from master to debian/sid to check git repo correctly? -- Regards, Hideki

Bug#863393: marked as done (qa.debian.org: vcswatch gets some corner cases wrong)

2017-05-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 May 2017 11:36:17 +0200 with message-id <20170526093614.sc6xhzbgaor7e...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#863393: qa.debian.org: vcswatch gets some corner cases wrong has caused the Debian Bug report #863393, regarding qa.debian.org: vcswatch gets some corner

Bug#863393: qa.debian.org: vcswatch gets some corner cases wrong

2017-05-26 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, vcswatch currently complains about sparse: https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=sparse It tells: UNREL: VCS matches the version in the archive, but the VCS changelog is UNRELEASED. The uploader should update the changelog and

Bug#816452: marked as done (vcswatch: should not use -rtip for Mercurial repos)

2016-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:41:53 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3561 has caused the Debian Bug report #816452, regarding vcswatch: should not use -rtip for Mercurial repos to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: qa.debian.org cgi vcswatch error

2016-07-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 01:47:45AM +0200, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Dear QA team, > > the website seems has problem visiting vcswatch cgi script. > > such as visiting: > - https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=adjtimex > > will return: > > >

  1   2   >