Bug#121459: Got microwindows to build on ppc

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But vgaplan4.c also includes that file (via vgaplan4.h) and appears to > need it. I got around this by modifying debian/config.fb so that it > won't build that part: > > --- config.fb.distSat Jan 5 15:40:15 2002 > +++ config.fb Sat Jan 5 14:18:30

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the > microwindows build tries to use that before it's built. No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving m

Bug#121459: Got microwindows to build on ppc

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > tags 121459 patch > thanks > > Fixing the source was actually pretty easy, but it took me quite a while > due to needing to fight the horrible build system from upstream. Thank you, you rock! I'll take care of uploading this.

Bug#115830: marked as done (cooledit: Forces an email send to author at start)

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jan 2002 14:55:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#115830: fixed in cooledit 3.17.1-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#127132: marked as done (cooledit fails to build from source on m68k)

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jan 2002 14:55:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#127132: fixed in cooledit 3.17.1-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#124515: marked as done (coolicon: Spelling error in description)

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Jan 2002 14:55:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#124515: fixed in cooledit 3.17.1-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

epan_1.3.1-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: epan_1.3.1-5.dsc to pool/non-free/e/epan/epan_1.3.1-5.dsc epan_1.3.1-5.tar.gz to pool/non-free/e/epan/epan_1.3.1-5.tar.gz epan_1.3.1-5_i386.deb to pool/non-free/e/epan/epan_1.3.1-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: Thank you for your co

cooledit_3.17.1-3.1_m68k.changes INSTALLED

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: cooledit_3.17.1-3.1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.1-3.1.diff.gz cooledit_3.17.1-3.1.dsc to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.1-3.1.dsc cooledit_3.17.1-3.1_m68k.deb to pool/main/c/cooledit/cooledit_3.17.1-3.1_m68k.deb coolicon_3.17.1-3.1_m68k.deb to pool/main/c/

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their > > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify > > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). The port maintainers > > Such as the pack

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
I concur with Dan here - part because it's really his job, part because I've had it with filing bug reports from m68k buildds myself. But there's always two sides to that issue, so: > > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > > every maintainer to do a few extra steps

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Adam Olsen
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > (I rarely do these > > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > > > logs).

Bug#127933: microwindows: microwindows source is organized wrong

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Package: microwindows Version: N/A Severity: normal The microwindows source is organized wrongly. The .orig.tar.gz file contains itself another .tar.gz, and a set of patches. This is so wrong, it doesn't even begin to deserve mention. But whoever adopts this package really *must* reorganize the

Bug#121459: Got microwindows to build on ppc

2002-01-06 Thread Aaron Schrab
tags 121459 patch thanks Fixing the source was actually pretty easy, but it took me quite a while due to needing to fight the horrible build system from upstream. The problem is that a couple of the drivers #include sys/io.h, which doesn't exist on ppc. As far as I can tell, scr_fb.c doesn't act

Processed: Got microwindows to build on ppc

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 121459 patch Bug#121459: microwindows doesn't build from source on powerpc (at least) Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the > package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no > libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86 > the file is in libmicrowindow

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies > > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all. > > As far as I can tell, it doesn't work: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&stamp=1010178840&file=log&as=raw The

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src/apps' make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/mi

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (I rarely do these > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > > logs). > > This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not > responsible

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). R

Bug#127472: marked as done (does not build from source on powerpc and s390)

2002-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jan 2002 15:01:46 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#127472: fixed in libsafe 2.0-9-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the > package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no > libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86 > the file is in libmicrowindow

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
On 4 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (I rarely do these > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > > logs). > > This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not > responsible for checking build status an

Bug#121459: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Technically these are binary NMUs, but I'd rather think of them as > happening on behalf of the maintainer by some obscure magic, and that > ultimately leaves the maintainer in charge of checking the result (at > least sporadically). That's a reasonab

Processing of epan_1.3.1-5_i386.changes

2002-01-06 Thread James Troup
epan_1.3.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to auric.debian.org along with the files: epan_1.3.1-5.dsc epan_1.3.1-5.tar.gz epan_1.3.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Processing of epan_1.3.1-5_i386.changes

2002-01-06 Thread Archive Administrator
epan_1.3.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: epan_1.3.1-5.dsc epan_1.3.1-5.tar.gz epan_1.3.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

[¼ºÀα¤°í]1¿ù 2ÀÏ ½Å±Ô ¼ºÀλçÀÌÆ® ¿ÀÇÂÇÕ´Ï´Ù..

2002-01-06 Thread bc°É