Processed: Scheduled for removal

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 195744 wontfix Bug#195744: xlander: no speed control Tags were: upstream Tags added: wontfix > tag 339229 wontfix Bug#339229: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change) There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tag 339257

Bug#121201: popular programs for everyday use.

2005-11-20 Thread Reckoning T. Fallowing
www.rxfcfgf7wexva99mwrr4e9rr.uncloseml.com Best regards, Customer[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sysv-rc-conf 0.99-2 MIGRATED to testing

2005-11-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the sysv-rc-conf source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.99-1 Current version: 0.99-2 -- This email is automatically generated. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

from where could I download entire base sarge system?

2005-11-20 Thread John Smith
Ladies and gentlemen, I try to build Debian disk. I already downloaded your wonderful installer and heap of packages I need. But I could be entirely happy if I could find entire base sarge system to download. Could you tell me from where I can do one. If it is not possible, I should like have a

Bug#339929: marked as done (aeromail: man page of the package)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:22:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processed: Reopen #281341

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # The localechooser upload mistakenly closed #281341 instead of #281431. > reopen 281341 Bug#281341: Tries to use version 2 bind which is disabled by default Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#339349: marked as done (pgperl )

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:12:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#315642: marked as done (python-slang: please build against libslang2)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:36:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#291760: marked as done (woody: bad email address for upstream author)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:34:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#78327: marked as done (ownership attribute)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:34:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#280606: marked as done (woody: New type of branch: Counting branch)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:34:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#162792: marked as done (woody: editing capabilities of the text describing a note is very limited)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:34:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#245419: marked as done (woody: Crashes when creating a new node 'c')

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:34:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#307197: marked as done (bbconf: Seg faults on start when no blackbox configuration exists)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:19:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#308781: marked as done (bbkeys/bbkeysrc bug)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:19:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#291715: marked as done (xt-aterm: does not work on 64-bit architectures)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:26:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#243445: marked as done (bbconf: 'Help' button should be labeled 'About'.)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:19:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#137418: marked as done (jslaunch: should use the kernel joystick driver)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:21:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#228794: marked as done (segmentation fault when applying changes to untitled style file)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:19:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#166517: marked as done (mmm-mode: Mere Presence of mmm-mode as a package causes emacs to (require 'cl))

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:23:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#115839: marked as done (mmm-mode fails in gnus (or vice-versa))

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:23:40 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#314261: marked as done (Upgrade plan from libgd-gif1 to something else?)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#278862: marked as done (libcap2-dev: please include static library (.a) in the package)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:12:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#209700: marked as done (The package description does not follow Debian policy)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#146729: marked as done (libcap2-bin: manpages could be more helpful)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:12:24 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#143721: marked as done (libgd-gif: New upstream release available (1.8.4))

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:06:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#314994: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: python-slang |0.2.0-8 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may

Bug#314996: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: woody | 0.1.6-11 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) w

Bug#300572: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xt-toolbus | 0.25-4 | source, arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xt-toolbus-doc | 0.25-4 | all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the ta

Bug#300571: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xt-toolbuslib |0.5.1-4 | source, arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not)

Bug#300570: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xt-aterm |2.0.5-3 | source, arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xt-aterm-dev |2.0.5-3 | arm, hppa, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xt-aterm-

epos_2.5.36-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: epos_2.5.36-3.diff.gz to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-3.diff.gz epos_2.5.36-3.dsc to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-3.dsc epos_2.5.36-3_i386.deb to pool/main/e/epos/epos_2.5.36-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 340021 Thank you for your c

Bug#300569: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: xt-sdf2 |2.0.1-5 | source, arm, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc xt-sdf2-dev |2.0.1-5 | arm, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(

Processing of epos_2.5.36-3_i386.changes

2005-11-20 Thread Archive Administrator
epos_2.5.36-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: epos_2.5.36-3.dsc epos_2.5.36-3.diff.gz epos_2.5.36-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Bug#274137: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mmm-mode |0.4.8-2 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) w

bwbasic bug with \ operator

2005-11-20 Thread John Gatewood Ham
Hello, Since I was unable to uncompress the sourceforge bwbasic code, I turned to debian to get bwbasic source. I got the bwbasic_2.2pl2.orig.tar.gz and applied the bwbasic_2.20pl2-6.diff.gz but learned the \ operator does not work. I have created a patch which sovles this problem (attached

Bug#260719: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: int-fiction-installer |1.5 | source, all Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The p

Bug#252152: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: jslaunch | 2.0-9 | source, alpha, arm, i386, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a b

Bug#259581: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: bbconf | 1.10-7 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (o

Bug#242810: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libcap2 | 0.cvs.20010529-4 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libcap2-bin | 0.cvs.20010529-4 | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, m

Bug#188456: fixed

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libgd-gif | 1.3-5 | source libgd-gif-tools | 1.3-5 | alpha, arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libgd-gif1 | 1.3-5 | alpha, arm, hppa

Bug#281341: marked as done (Tries to use version 2 bind which is disabled by default)

2005-11-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:17:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#281341: fixed in localechooser 0.23 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now