-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased_10
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
>From 01a9df8ce325c5df9762f0db86128614b4d3476c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Gibanel Lo
El 26/08/16 a las 13:34, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of
isolinux/syslinux in live-build.
I know, but the purpose of my patch is to add UEFI support. Not to improve
visual appearance of grub2 so
El 26/08/16 a las 09:52, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote:
That's how the grub-pc menu (BIOS) shows currently in live-build.
Well, it sucks compared to the default visual appearance of
isolinux/syslinux in live-build.
I know, but the purpose of my patch
El 25/08/16 a las 15:36, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hello Adrian,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Kristian Klausen thinks is a good idea to wait for your tests.
So your feedback is welcome.
I just built a test Kali image with your patch applied. It works:
I can boot the live system
El 04/08/16 a las 14:51, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Is there anyone else than can provide feedback on this patch / branch?
Either by:
* Installing live-build with this applied patch
* Building your iso and check if it boots in both BIOS and UEFI mode
El 04/08/16 a las 14:51, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
Hi,
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016, adrian15 wrote:
Is there anyone else than can provide feedback on this patch / branch?
Either by:
* Installing live-build with this applied patch
* Building your iso and check if it boots in both BIOS and UEFI mode
that time I'll try to request a proper pull / insertion into
Debian's live-build repo and probably into live-build package binaries.
adrian15
El 31/07/16 a las 10:12, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
On 31 July 2016 at 09:35, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
This new update tries to imp
and can be found here:
http://www.supergrubdisk.org/2016/07/31/rescatux-0-40-beta-7-released/ .
As always feedback is welcome.
El 22/03/16 a las 07:18, Michal Suchanek escribió:
On 21 March 2016 at 23:06, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
El 21/03/16 a las 22:19, Michal Suchanek es
El 21/03/16 a las 22:19, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
On 21 March 2016 at 21:09, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
The branch which include specifically the commits I attach here as patches
is:
https://github.com/rescatux/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_reb
hardware, in your
distro builds, even if you don't use UEFI does the ISO boot as always in
BIOS mode?) And give us feedback on it.
Thank you.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
>F
Package: live-build
Version: 5.0~a11-1
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I was trying to use @VERSION@ string in splash.svg.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I used @VERSION@ string in splash.svg.
* What
ng variables we have so that we know
what's going on in l-b?
Thanks
Michal
Well, basically, my design rationale behind this is that with the
current way of doing things you need to update binary_iso file each time
a new bootloader is added.
With what I'm proposing you you wouldn't have to u
El 25/01/16 a las 16:12, Michal Suchanek escribió:
On 25 January 2016 at 03:05, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
El 24/01/16 a las 16:51, Michal Suchanek escribió:
What you are describing here is what it's actually implemented in my patch
(Well, actually the first patch v
fs options.
If you check current: binary_iso file it just relies on existing
binary_bootloaders without having an agnostic bootloader approach.
Here it's what I'm talking about:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/blob/5eba3dff5a16a34c3c1eb5d54e3767339654e2d0/scripts/build/binary_iso#L111
_bootloader files so
that we have some sort of Object-Oriented / Hook programming when
defining what goes into the mkisofs options.
If you check current: binary_iso file it just relies on existing
binary_bootloaders without having an agnostic bootloader approach.
Here it'
s refering to USB stick then.
adrian15 wrote:
Grub-pc would be the one installed to be boot but syslinux files would be
there for Multi-USB tools to know how to understand the iso and put it into
an USB.
You mean the capability to boot the ISO via BIOS from USB stick ?
(Known with SYSLINUX as
El 21/01/16 a las 12:57, Thomas Schmitt escribió:
adrian15 wrote:
Do you mean if you have:
xorriso bunch-of-options-1 -eltorito-alt-boot bunch-of-options-2
you could just re-arrange them as:
xorriso bunch-of-options-2 -eltorito-alt-boot bunch-of-options-1
and it would be fine?
From
ot;Main bootloader"
and
"Alternate bootloader".
Or maybe even better:
"Main eltorito entry"
and
"Alternate eltorito entry"
?
So that we can force a given bootloader to be used only as a "Main
eltorito entry" ?
What do you think about this idea?
ad
ed on live-build master
branch) here:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased_4
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/dona
have stated earlier (although I might have missed
something there) they would overwrite their /efi/boot/boot*efi files ?
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super Grub Disk. Apoya el software
libre. Dona a Super Grub Disk. http://www.supergrubdisk.org/donate/
El 18/01/16 a las 13:38, Thomas Schmitt escribió:
Hi,
adrian15 wrote:
* What is it a secondary bootloader?
It's what happens when you request mkisofs that your bootloader to be
boot in second place or as a second partition. I don't know how it
actually works.
An ISO may contain several lures
to fix this situation on:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd_rebased
and
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/commits/syslinux-efi-2016
.
(I will probably do another rebase in another branch in the future with
other of your suggestions and these fixes.)
2
El 18/01/16 a las 07:31, Michal Suchanek escribió:
Hello,
thanks for working on this.
On 18 January 2016 at 05:24, adrian15 <adrian15...@gmail.com> wrote:
In my last message I forgot to CC many people who are involved in this bug
so I'm going to refer to my former message, CC some
with syslinux-efi.
The quick and dirty branch where I worked on both grub-efi and
syslinux-efi is here:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd
That branch is handy to understand the changes between Raphael's
original patch and what I present here.
adrian15
translate syslinux configuration files into grub
configuration files.
Feedback is welcome!
P.S.: I am going to release soon: Rescatux 0.40b3 which will be based on
these commits so you will be able to see how it would perform the final
product.
adrian15
--
Support free software. Donate to Super
to
your email program and reply from there) can be found at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731709#153
2) Repo / Branches:
* efi_support_based_on_debian_cd (
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd
) : Original dirty branch where I worked
I attach a patch based on your work (which I have not tested so feedback
is welcome).
You can find the specific modifications to your original commit/patch
(which I had to cherry-pick) on branch:
https://github.com/adrian15/live-build/tree/efi_support_based_on_debian_cd
Now I'm going
27 matches
Mail list logo
