Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 936794 serious
Bug #936794 [src:kig] kig: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
936794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:38:44 +0200 Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > > I'm pretty sure boost 1.67.0 can stay 3 months more around, especially
> > > since I see it is still not the only package using the old boost.
> > >
> >
> > No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 936794 important
Bug #936794 [src:kig] kig: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
936794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
I have doublechecked that all other packages that still depend on
boost1.67 are all marked RC-buggy and pending autoremovals with
various dates.
kig is not an exception, and is treated the same way as all other
packages still using boost1.67.
since kig rebuilds against boost1.71 were successful p
In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 12:49:19 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:38:44 +0200 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > > > I'm pretty sure boost 1.67.0 can stay 3 months more around, especially
> > >
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 12:14 Pino Toscano, wrote:
> In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 12:49:19 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:38:44 +0200 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha
> scritto:
> > > > > I'm pretty sure bo
In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 14:19:39 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> You are not being reasonable either.
I am being reasonable as your unreasonable attitude.
> Boost1.71 transition was prepared since February.
>
> kig, like majority of packages, succeeded to build in all test rebuilds
md4c_0.4.4-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
md4c_0.4.4-1.dsc
md4c_0.4.4.orig.tar.gz
md4c_0.4.4-1.debian.tar.xz
md4c_0.4.4-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
binary:libmd4c-html0 is NEW.
binary:libmd4c-html0-dev is NEW.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
binary:libmd4c-html0 is NEW.
binary:libmd4c-html0-dev is NEW.
binary:libmd4c-html0 is NEW.
binary:libmd4c-html0-dev is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and fi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kpat
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
> #
> user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
Setting us
Package: kdialog
Version: 4:20.04.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
kdialog --passivepopup "Helloworld" 5 print plain text "Helloworld"
kdialog --msgbox "Helloworld" 5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kpat
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #946420 (http://bugs.debian.org/946420)
# B
Sorry for the typos in my report.
kdialog --passivepopup "Helloworld" 5
kdialog --msgbox "Helloworld"
creates a two-line formatted output.
In version 19.12 both variants process html tags.
Thx, volker
Package: kio-gdrive
Version: 1.2.5+fixedtarball-1
Followup-For: Bug #948207
Dear Maintainer,
I just discovered this bug by reading this opened subject. I requested an new
authorization thanks to google account security website and the problem
appeared indicating that Google need to validate thi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 508642 25-2
Bug #508642 {Done: Jonas Smedegaard } [sugar-calculate-activity]
i18n removed
No longer marked as found in versions sugar-calculate-activity/25-2.
> notfixed 957755 1.2.2-1
Bug #957755 {Done: "Chris Lamb" } [src:redisearch]
16 matches
Mail list logo