Hi all,
This is just a friendly note to let the maintainers of the listed
packages know that they are very close to being ready for testing.
Because gnat 3.15p breaks backwards-compatibility with gnat 3.14p,
however, all of these packages must be ready for inclusion in testing at
the same time.
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies:
> > > > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips
> > > > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips
>
==> force nvidia-graphics-drivers/1.0.4496-10
The testing scripts still don't recognize that non-free packages can
depend on packages not in Debian, so there's no other way to get this in.
--
Nathanael Nerode
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:31:58PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies:
> > > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips
> > > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips
> > > - gnome-office needs pl
Colin Watson wrote:
> > - meta-gnome2 has unsatisfiable dependencies:
> > - gnome needs rhythmbox compiled for mips
> > - gnome-desktop-environment needs epiphany-browser compiled for mips
> > - gnome-office needs planner compiled for m68k, mips, sparc
>
> Those don't make it not a valid
Please remove the gvd package from sarge, so that the gnat (3.15) and
other updated packages are allowed to transition to sarge. gvd's
functionality is somewhat replaced by gnat-gps. gvd currently cannot
be built using libgtkada2. Not sure, if libgtkada1 needs to be removed
from sarge as well.
Tha
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 08:51:06PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Jordi Mallach wrote:
> > [0] today's update excuses claim that meta-gnome2 needs galeon to go in,
> > while it really doesn't, as it's just an alternative to
> > epiphany-browser. We'll see if this blocks meta-gnome2 tonight, and if
Jordi Mallach wrote:
> [0] today's update excuses claim that meta-gnome2 needs galeon to go in,
> while it really doesn't, as it's just an alternative to
> epiphany-browser. We'll see if this blocks meta-gnome2 tonight, and if
> it does, I'll tell aj to apply some voodoo magic.
Either you are wron
Hi guys,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:36:33PM +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> We have been trying to get the meta-gnome2 deps in testing for a long
> while, but for different reasons (libtool, python and gcc breakages, new
> deps being added...) it hasn't happened yet.
Consider the freeze over, all t
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:13:11PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:01:06PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I notice that lots of people here and elsewhere are talking as if
> > sarge's release is fairly imminant. I must have missed a message from aj
> > giving a projected date;
Hi,
Please try rebuilding ecasound2.2 package on s390,
it has previously failed with a strange error,
failing to find aclocal on the path.
Having ecasound2.2 built and released to testing is required before getting
a new incompatible jack version.
ecawave and ecamegapedal are in a uncomforta
11 matches
Mail list logo
