On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:18:53AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> remove debian-guide/1.1.0
FTBFS, and apparently not updated since potato. Removing.
> remove debian-guide-zh/0.6
Same problem, same solution.
> remove erlang-mode/2.3-2
I don't see any pressing need to remove this; it will f
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 12:14:08AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > remove gnopernicus/0.7.1-1
> > This is needed in order to remove gnome-mag.
> > It's "still experimental" and there is no official release yet, so
> > this shouldn't be a terrible loss in its current state.
> I mentioned this
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 07:43:15PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> On 2004-03-06 17:14 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Are there plans to make the pending upload? When? postgresql
> > currently blocks some more packages.
>
> According to Oliver (the primary maintainer) there will be a new
> bugfix u
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:14:24PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> postgresql still has one RC report open, which was marked pending on
> 24 Feb by Martin Pitt. Are there plans to make the pending upload?
> When? postgresql currently blocks some more packages.
>
> If the upload is not made ... post
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:18:53AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> remove pgeasy/1:3.0.1-2
> No copyright. Now, this is probably going to be cleared up eventually,
> but you don't want to release sarge with it in this state.
As discussed elsewhere recently, the pgeasy source package has neve
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:17:59PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, I wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > > They were actually hinted today, but it looks like that failed for some
> > > reason. You can see it at the top of
> > > http://ftp-master.debian.or
Hi there!
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, I wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > > > It looks to me like they need to be manually hinted to go in together.
> > >
> > > Ah, thanks a lot! What do I need to do to "manually hint them to go in
> > > together"? Which button do I have to press??
Hi Matthias!
On 2004-03-06 17:14 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> postgresql still has one RC report open, which was marked pending on
> 24 Feb by Martin Pitt.
Right, our current CVS fixes some ten bugs, amongst them the RC bug.
> Are there plans to make the pending upload? When? postgresql
> cu
postgresql still has one RC report open, which was marked pending on
24 Feb by Martin Pitt. Are there plans to make the pending upload?
When? postgresql currently blocks some more packages.
If the upload is not made ... postgresql had two RC reports, which are
fixed in unstable (versioned shlibs d
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:01:11PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> I'm not quite prepared to remove it completely from the distribution,
> the idea of the package seems useful and there seems to be upstream work
> being done now.
FWIW, someone mentioned on my local LUG list that "bitlbee" is good
to
10 matches
Mail list logo
