On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 06:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >...
> > > Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> > > I promptly down
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >...
> > Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> > I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect that will be
> > because of t
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
>...
> Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect that will be
> because of the new sppc upload, making it a transitive problem.
Please don't forge
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> I compiled a list of all RC bugs older than about one month against
> package versions in testing. Some should perhaps be removed from
> testing, other need a review. Comments and actions welcome.
>...
> remove crm114/20040312-
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> imagemagick
> #235712 is this really RC?
I doubt it is RC, as I already noted in my followup to the bug report.
The submitter has not provided the requested additional information so
far, either. Nothing but silence from the imag
I compiled a list of all RC bugs older than about one month against
package versions in testing. Some should perhaps be removed from
testing, other need a review. Comments and actions welcome.
remove brahms/1.02-kde3-3
#235025
Can please someone look if it really can be reassigned? Else
remove it
On Friday 26 March 2004 17.59, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> In the mean time I see Adrian has tagged this bug unreproducible.
Just to make sure nobody misunderstands: I propose downgrading as well, but I
haven't done that as (i) IANADD and (ii) I'm no regular bug-triage/qa
contributor either.
gree
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 11:28:24AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> arts is currently #2 in the ranking of stallers on
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/stalls.html (right after xfree86) the
> only[1] thing that is currently keeping it out of testing besides the
> dependency on xfree86 (but that one sho
Hello,
arts is currently #2 in the ranking of stallers on
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/stalls.html (right after xfree86) the
only[1] thing that is currently keeping it out of testing besides the
dependency on xfree86 (but that one should go in today) is #240188.
#240188 is a priority issue: libarts
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:40:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > XFree86 4.3 should be in as soon as it builds and is uploaded on s390.
> > > There's no othe
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:40:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > XFree86 4.3 should be in as soon as it builds and is uploaded on s390.
> > There's no other new upstream version IMHO worth actually delaying the
> > release fo
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> XFree86 4.3 should be in as soon as it builds and is uploaded on s390.
> There's no other new upstream version IMHO worth actually delaying the
> release for.
XFree86 4.3.0 is now only being help up by weird stuff I don't fully
u
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:14:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> => easy lam/7.0.4-2 blacs-mpi/1.1-21 scalapack/1.7-7
> >> python-scientific/2.4.5-2 hdf5/1.6.1-4 netpipe/3.6-1 xmpi/2.2.3b8-3
> >> Lets that whole list in.
> Well, this isn't working, apparently, from the big "FAILED" in
> upda
13 matches
Mail list logo
