On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:50:23AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:22:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > There was little point holding up 4.3.0's progress into sarge because of
> > it; the exact same bug is present in XFree86 4.2.1, already in sarge.
> >
> > http://bug
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:22:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> There was little point holding up 4.3.0's progress into sarge because of
> it; the exact same bug is present in XFree86 4.2.1, already in sarge.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=libx11-6
I don't disagree with
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:12:58 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) wrote:
> I filed bug 241225 to prevent new hotplug from going into sarge until the
> ALSA issue is resolved.
Can one of the release managers comment on this? Me and the other ALSA
maintainers had planned on changing (perhaps g
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:12:58PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> New hotplug currently breaks alsa for basically everyone using
> kernel 2.6. This is a nasty regression, regardless of whose "fault" it is,
> and it seems extremely inappropriate to allow this regression to propagate
> into sarge.
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The 2.6 kernel has removed get_kernel_syms entirely, and the syscall appears
> (looking at the sources) to return a no-such-syscall error. So I'm
> suspicious that the klogd code which uses get_kernel_syms (in ksym_mod.c) to
> translate addresses
On 2004-04-01 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:43:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > I'd like to get exim 4.31 into sarge but before I waste time I want
> > ask whether^Whow hard I'll be kicked.
> > * The dependencies won't change. - The version in s
Martin Schulze wrote:
>> Really, 2.*2*? Any reason for that rather than 2.4?
>
> They're similar. So it's from 2.4 as well. Please take a look at the
> source and let me know if there are any problems to be expected with
> it, if you're in doubt.
The structures are the same... except for one th
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:08:18AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 05:33:57AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > For zope to be removed, one must also do this:
> > > remove zope-textindexng2/2.05-1
> > > remove zope-zpatterns
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It fits even better. :-) Thanks for finding the time to do this in amongst
> all your other work. Rrowr... now there's just db3, db4.0, glibc,
> linux-kernel-headers, ;-)
>
> Incidentally, regarding bug #223210, I notice:
>* Added a private module.h with extrac
9 matches
Mail list logo
