On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
After a week of hard work we have made a lot of progress, so I hope this
time it'll be ok for release time :
Curses. So much for the easy answers.
* Architectures :
We have full builds on these 10 architectures :
- alpha
-
On 2004-05-22 Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
[...]
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
packages.
Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?
[...]
I doubt that (but I am not involved with d-i). debootstrap already
installs
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
packages.
Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?
debootstrap
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 12:09:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The m68k build is in progress (gtk+2.0 and a part of gnome2.6 have been
built).
Unfortunately, in progress doesn't mean it'll work. Python-gtk2
failed on m68k:
Byte-compiling python modules...
dsextras.py
Byte-compiling python
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:22:56PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le sam, 22/05/2004 à 18:09 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The m68k build is in progress (gtk+2.0 and a part of gnome2.6 have been
built).
Le sam, 22/05/2004 à 18:29 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
Of course not. But I'm not really involved with gnome, and it was in the
list provided to me when I asked what packages needed to be built...
No problem. In fact it's on the list of stuffs to build (still good to
test ...) but not a
Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant consequences: I
cannot use it, because it insists upon trying to access /dev/dsp directly. Why
can't it access it directly? Because Esound is running. Why can't Rhythmbox be
configured to use gstreamer0.8-esd? Because
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 01:36:15AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant consequences:
I
cannot use it, because it insists upon trying to access /dev/dsp directly.
[...]
This is a tiny example, but it clearly shows that transition
Le dim, 23/05/2004 à 01:36 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant consequences
rhythmbox is not related to gnome2.6 at all, not build on other archs
and uploaded out of gnome2.6 which is still in experimental atm. Keep
unrelated
Le dim, 23/05/2004 à 03:06 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
anyhow. This just goes to show that Rhythmbox 0.8.4 should not have been
allowed to enter unstable until the 2.6 gnome-core did.
Ok, and even in this case, it's not a gnome2.6 part, we have not worked
on it ... you can't juge
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Sun, 23 May 2004, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le dim, 23/05/2004 à 01:36 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine a écrit :
Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant
consequences
rhythmbox is not related to gnome2.6 at all,
That's incorrect.
Seb: I realize you're anxious to get GNOME 2.6 into unstable, but Rhythmbox
proved that you want to go too far too fast. Soon, but not now.
Sounds more like someone wants him to go too slow.
13 matches
Mail list logo
