At Sun, 13 Jun 2004 22:27:16 +0200,
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Herbert Xu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040302 08:10]:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:22:30PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
Well newer initrd-tools module-init-tools should be in woody
in order to upgrade to sarge smoothly.
Is this
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
# suggestions from 2004-06-09
# build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction
# no dependencies
# 246963
remove dchub/0.4.5-2
Hinted.
# security issue; report from 2004-04-27; no maintainer
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 11:18:51PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 22:46:48 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Never the less, I think the original question (whether 7.2.4 should be
accepted for woody) is a good one.
True, though I think a better question would be a
Here is a casino giving away $25 Free when you sign up an account.
No credit card required
http://secret.cls2.org/iwin.html
Sondra
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
since some time, it's not possible to upgrade to sarge with an real
i386-box (real mean: not i486 or higher). This is due to changes in
the gcc, and therefore we need an upgrade kernel etc, see bug #241497
for the details. It was intended to put
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 02:59:24PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hello,
I object to the Release Manager's decision of choosing a military-related
term (sarge) for the next release of Debian.
Yeah, I agree. I also object to choosing an adjective ('woody') as one
of our release names. We
Hello,
I object to the Release Manager's decision of choosing a military-related
term (sarge) for the next release of Debian.
I don't think this is done intentionaly, but using military terms to codename
a Debian release is in fact turning an innocent element into pro-militarist
propaganda.
Hello, I have a special offer for you...
WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT?
The most powerful weightloss is now available
without prescription. All natural Adipren720
100% Money Back Guarantée!
- Lose up to 19% Total Body Weight.
- Up to 300% more Weight Loss while dieting.
- Loss of 20-35% abdominal Fat.
-
Hi Robert!
You wrote:
I object to the Release Manager's decision of choosing a military-related
term (sarge) for the next release of Debian.
I don't think this is done intentionaly, but using military terms to codename
a Debian release is in fact turning an innocent element into
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 22:46 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 08:33:15PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
Can I put the package in stable-proposed-updates anyway?
I don't think that's productive. It's probably a lot more productive to
This is just as ridiculous as the petition for changing the name of the
The Two Towers movie after 9-11.
Hey, I don't mind if you find my petition ridiculous, but don't put Toy Story
at the same level as Tolkien's work ok? ;)
--
Robert Millan
[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in
Hello,
The juk and kopete source packages can be removed from the archive. Juk
and kopete are now provided by the main KDE packages, in both Sid and
Sarge. Neither package was in Woody.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
[Sorry if the cc is unwelcome.]
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:47:19PM -0400, Christopher Martin wrote:
The juk and kopete source packages can be removed from the archive. Juk
and kopete are now provided by the main KDE packages, in both Sid and
Sarge. Neither package was in Woody.
Please tell
Your customer service request has been received by Woman's Day. You should
receive an email response in 2-3 business days.
On June 14, 2004 18:58, Colin Watson wrote:
Please tell this to the ftpmasters, via a bug on ftp.debian.org.
Ah, I see. Thanks for the tip.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
Hi,
Being referred to here by Colin Watson, does somebody here know how to
and have the power to approve the recent upload of subversion in
testing-proposed-updates of subversion? It is a security-only
backport of subversion, the sid version of subversion (some upstream
versions further) is
Goswin von Brederlow said:
Is anyone still using real i386 cpus?
I decommissioned my last one a few months ago. (12 years old...) Maybe
the best thing to do would be to announce via debian-announce, DWN etc
that i386 will likely be dropped for sarge and only i486 and higher CPUs
supported?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:02:26AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow said:
Is anyone still using real i386 cpus?
I have one in fully working condition - but only with 6M of memory :(
[Will probably run 0.93rc1 fine, though :) ]
Quite a lot of smaller PC104 class embedded CPU's
18 matches
Mail list logo
