You are right. I just haven't had time to get to it yet and for that I
apologize.
I would agree that it should be removed for the time being and I can deal
with it after release.
Ivan
Hi Ivan.
There is a long standing bug[*] against ksocrat-data stating that it
contains non-free material.
Ivan,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:15:28PM -0600, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
You are right. I just haven't had time to get to it yet and for that I
apologize.
I would agree that it should be removed for the time being and I can deal
with it after release.
Under the current release policy, with
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:07:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
#255582 gpdf
I was unable to reproduce this bug in testing, and from the reports it
sounded like it should be easily reproducible. Perhaps it has since
cleared up due to
Hmmm...well then, let's not mess with it. Unless someone really has an
issue with it let's leave it and I'll get it fixed as soon as I can get my
act together.
Thanks,
Ivan
Ivan,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 10:15:28PM -0600, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
You are right. I just haven't had time to
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:03:16PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
#262395 xmltex
Installation of xmltex and other TeX format packages may fail if
tetex-bin is configured not to use update-fmtutil. The tetex-bin
configuration warns about this. I told the user what was going on.
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.4-7
Severity: serious
This bug report is the result of a conversation on #debian-release, as
IRC is volatile I capture it now.
If gcc-3.3 is built on a machine with binutils 2.15 gcc's ./configure
test
| checking linker --as-needed support... yes
will succeed and
Executive summary: enlightenment is the last package that is blocking
some other package. guikachu's maintainer specifically requested
NMU. Here's the rest of the details.
It's possible that some of these have been uploaded but not processed
far enough for the RC bug to have been closed. My
Since #237422 refers specifically to the version of mozilla in
woody, can't it be set to sarge-ignore?
--
Joe
http://www.etrumeus.com/~deejoe
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 11:45:15AM -0500, D. Joe Anderson wrote:
Since #237422 refers specifically to the version of mozilla in
woody, can't it be set to sarge-ignore?
Definitely not; sarge-ignore is for a different purpose. On the other
hand, it can happily be tagged woody, which it already is
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 17:59 schrieb Jay Berkenbilt:
Executive summary: enlightenment is the last package that is
blocking some other package. guikachu's maintainer specifically
requested NMU. Here's the rest of the details.
It's possible that some of these have been uploaded but not
Jay Berkenbilt writes:
vtk
I'm back from my vacation and am building vtk now. Don't know
if I will get it in under today's batch or not...
-Maitland
A few days ago I filed Bug#263117 (FTBFS on m68k) on FFTW3.
Justin Pryzby just sent me an email saying that the package
is orphaned. Both of us very much want to have FFTW in
Sarge. But neither of us can debug the problem since we
don't have m68k hardware. (We also aren't Debian
developers, so
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
A few days ago I filed Bug#263117 (FTBFS on m68k) on FFTW3.
Justin Pryzby just sent me an email saying that the package
is orphaned. Both of us very much want to have FFTW in
Sarge. But neither of us can debug the problem since
Roland Bauerschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
#260784 ldap-utils
This bug appears to have been fixed some time back and the new version
has propagated into sarge. I believe that this bug can now be closed.
No, unfortunately, 2.1.30-3 is not in sarge yet:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 06:40:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:33:27AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
A few days ago I filed Bug#263117 (FTBFS on m68k) on FFTW3.
Justin Pryzby just sent me an email saying that the package
is orphaned. Both of us very much want to
Russ Allbery wrote:
That tight dependency should, if I'm not mistaken, resolve the original
problem.
Of course, you're right. I was still kind of thinking 2.1.23 was in
testing (maybe because a lot of bugs fixed a long time ago have been
filed lately...). Thanks for pointing it out!
Roland
Currently, OpenLDAP 2.1.30-1 is in sarge. Unfortunately, that's a very
buggy version. I uploaded 2.1.30-3 about a week ago (I think), with
urgency high. It hasn't propagated into testing yet due to missing
dependencies (gnutls11 and gcc-3.4 according to update_excuses). Among
other bugs, 2.1.30-3
hint bos stratagus stratagus-gl
or maybe: hint bos/1.1-3 stratagus/2.1-4 stratagus-gl/2.1-4
It looks like a hint should help. I don't see any other reasons.
Thanks,
Drew Daniels
PS: please CC me.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:22:24PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
hint bos stratagus stratagus-gl
or maybe: hint bos/1.1-3 stratagus/2.1-4 stratagus-gl/2.1-4
It looks like a hint should help. I don't see any other reasons.
I dropped stratagus-gl, as testing operates by source packages.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 11:59:40AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
Executive summary: enlightenment is the last package that is blocking
some other package. guikachu's maintainer specifically requested
NMU. Here's the rest of the details.
It's possible that some of these have been uploaded
I've been discussing this with various people all week, and since I now have
a working prototype, I would to propose it and see what feedback there is.
First, what I'm suggesting: two new packages for sarge and one modified
package. They would allow 64-bit applications using a small set of
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 11:59:40AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
povray-3.5
This is non-free. Will it block the transition then? Anyway, jvw is
normally very active, so probably he will fix it soon.
vrweb
I will NMU this
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:42:30PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
First, what I'm suggesting: two new packages for sarge and one modified
package. They would allow 64-bit applications using a small set of standard
libraries to run on an otherwise i386 installation, and allow 64-bit
23 matches
Mail list logo
