On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 21:08:09 -0400, James Strandboge wrote:
I am the maintainer of the gnome2.2 backport for woody, and in working
on the transition of the backport to sarge I ran into the problem with
'apt' on woody where packages get configured in the wrong order (because
of how it deals
There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
tiff transition. They are:
epplets
gnobog
libimager-perl
libtk-img
lightspeed
mountapp
qvwm
In addition to these, the following packages haven't been handled but
aren't in sarge and therefore shouldn't interfere with the
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'm seeking the opinion of the release team on whether there's any
point right now in trying to get a new (never-before-uploaded) package
with priority extra into sarge at this point.
If you can get it through NEW before the date
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'm seeking the opinion of the release team on whether there's any
point right now in trying to get a new (never-before-uploaded) package
with priority extra into
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 06:12:06PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'm seeking the opinion of the release team on whether there's any
point right now in trying to
* Domenico Andreoli [Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:12:06 +0200]:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
If you can get it through NEW before the date marked last date for
urgency=low uploads, there's no reason why not.
ehm.. where could i read about such date?
$ links
* Jay Berkenbilt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
tiff transition. They are:
epplets
yea, yea, I'll be uploading a new version later today. Probably not
before the dinstall run, but it'll be with 'urgency=medium'. I've
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:08:11AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
There are only seven packages left that are potentially holding up the
tiff transition. They are:
epplets
epplets is being addressed by its maintainer.
gnobog
Jordi Mallach has been having problems getting this one to build,
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'm seeking the opinion of the release team on whether there's any
point right now in trying to get a new (never-before-uploaded) package
with priority extra into sarge at this point.
If you can get it through NEW
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 12:58:41PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'm seeking the opinion of the release team on whether there's any
point right now in trying to get a new (never-before-uploaded) package
with priority
13 months ago[1], I wrote:
Hi MIPS porters,
I'm quite puzzled by the behaviour of the mips buildds:
- resume.rfc822.org is able to build bigloo [1]
- reconfig.rfc822.org is not [2][3]
- there is a bug in some versions of gcc (including 3.x up to 3.3, but
maybe already fixed in latest
11 matches
Mail list logo
