I think I've asked this before: Can openldap2 be hinted into sarge?
Thanks, Roland
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> In some cases, it is acceptable for a library to be available in static form
> only; these cases include:
> [...]
> * libraries which are explicitly intended to be available only in
> static form by their upstream author(s)
>
IMHO that case covers "Upstream has
On 2004-08-18 "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I want to
> a) verify that "libgpvm3 does not have a shared library" is indeed
> an RC bug.
[...]
Afaict it is not.
8.3 Static libraries
[...]
In some cases, it is acceptable for a library to be available in static form
only
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:02:21AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> - rpvm should NOT check for a static library if it cannot use a static
>> library. This is a bug in rpvm upstream.
> Nope: rpvm can only assume static libs, as the rest of the world uses only
> static libs. We are different, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release team,
My sponsor (Bas) and I are planning an upload of cernlib to unstable
with priority medium. The upload fixes an (unfiled) possibly RC bug
similar to #245915, but affecting the libgeant1-dev binary package. The
problem is that the c
(You forgot to cc the bts for the bug in question)
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:41:13PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> [Cc-ing debian-release to reach an RM; please keep the discussion on the bug
> as I'm not subscribed to -release.]
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:21:34AM -0500, Dirk Eddelb
[Cc-ing debian-release to reach an RM; please keep the discussion on the bug
as I'm not subscribed to -release.]
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:21:34AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> But when there is no shared one, the static one is used, which simply does
>> not work; this is not pvm's fault. T
Hi,
ordinarily I'm arguing to users why we shouldn't push some release of a
package of mine on to the stable track, but this time I'd like to make
the case to get one on it.
The cpad-kernel package is well tested by a fairly large proportion of
Linux users known to own such hardware. It has bee
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 04:30:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> "You're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!"
>
> As of last night, thanks to Daniel Silverstone, no more base (as
> installed by debootstrap) or standard (by priority) packages will be
> accepted into testing from unstable.
>
On 2004-08-18 Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Spamassassin 2.64-1 is not yet built on mipsel, therefore, it's not yet
> in sarge. However, 2.64 fixes a security bug, see
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-announce&m=109168121628767&w=2 :
[...]
> I'm not sure wether it's app
Martin Schulze wrote:
> mysql-dfsg 4.0.20-11 needed, have 4.0.18-5 for DSA 540
Don't worry, I'm keeping it up-to-date for new DSAs. Here's the current
status, FWIW:
mysql-dfsg 4.0.20-11 needed, have 4.0.18-5 for DSA-540
kdelibs 4:3.3.0-1 needed, have 4:3.2.3-2 for DSA-539
rsync 2.6.2-3 needed, ha
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 11:00:20AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-08-18 Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure wether it's appropriate to file an RC bug to spamassassin,
> > since 2.64-1 is in unstable already.
>
> Noting it in http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~sarge/ is proba
>
> Some problems have been reported printing our home page,
> www.debian.org, from mozilla (or firefox) using Xprint
> (xprt-xprintorg), see bugs #235592, #251067.
>
> With the combination of latest versions (firefox 0.9.3-2,
> Xprint 0.0.9.final.001-3 (upstream 009.001), www.debian.org
> is
Many thanks for tackling this.
Joey Hess wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:42:03PM -0300, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > We have now finished checking all the DSAs since woody's release, except
> > > for a few that we didn't reach any conclusions on. That the following
> > > DSAs seem to still be unfi
Hi,
[Please honor Mail-Followup-To and Cc me on replies: I'm not subscribed
to this list.]
Spamassassin 2.64-1 is not yet built on mipsel, therefore, it's not yet
in sarge. However, 2.64 fixes a security bug, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-announce&m=109168121628767&w=2 :
"Se
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> It was uploaded before the freeze but did not get in because of broken
> buildds. It only contains new debconf translations.
Forced in over the freeze.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Dig
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:32:14AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Please let libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4 proceed into sarge.
> It fixes the shared lib dependency (a new function was added in 0.2.10).
> It's currently 2 of 5 days old; I'm mailing now because in three days I'll
> be on vacation.
If the f
Please let libtasn1-2 0.2.10-4 proceed into sarge.
It fixes the shared lib dependency (a new function was added in 0.2.10).
It's currently 2 of 5 days old; I'm mailing now because in three days I'll
be on vacation.
18 matches
Mail list logo
