Status of H323 packages in Sarge/Sid

Hi, Though I have talked a bit about this with Steve on IRC, I have made some other checks and new things have arised. When I talk about VoIP packages in this mail, I refer to those listed with maintainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, plus GnomeMeeting. After hard work these latest weeks, trying

Re: patch explanation

* Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-19 10:45]: > >I'm a staff of OpenI18N which is the organization to encourage i18n. ... > >As the substitution is lacked, sed does wrong behavior when > >the byte length of src_buf differs from the length of dest_buf. > >When using multibyte characters, the

patch explanation

>I'm a staff of OpenI18N which is the organization to encourage i18n. >I think you got an attached report from Stew Benedict. >Here's a proposed patch for that issue. Could you please look at this? > >The reason why this issue occurs seems to be a confusion of variables >for character byte length.

Re: sed in sarge

Clint Adams wrote: > GNU sed upstream has requested that the attached patch from the > OpenI18N people be applied to sarge. I told him that I would ask the > release team. The obvious question: What is this patch good for? Thiemo

Re: sed in sarge

* Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-19 09:58]: > GNU sed upstream has requested that the attached patch from the > OpenI18N people be applied to sarge. I told him that I would ask > the release team. Do you know if that's needed for LSB compliance? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sed in sarge

GNU sed upstream has requested that the attached patch from the OpenI18N people be applied to sarge. I told him that I would ask the release team. diff -uprN sed-4.1.1.orig/sed/compile.c sed-4.1.1/sed/compile.c --- sed-4.1.1.orig/sed/compile.c2004-08-18 20:29:58.742844320 +0900 +++ sed-4.1

Re: Release update: base and standard frozen

> Also you mention updated package translations, does this include *new* > translations or only fixes to existing ones? My opinion is that this includes new translations. I mean, uploading to t-p-u with new translations is OK. This is even more important for dictionaries-common because this pa

Re: Bug#264403: rpvm: FTBFS m68k: /usr/lib/pvm3/conf/LINUXR68R.def: No such file or directory

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 04:41:13PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > [Cc-ing debian-release to reach an RM; please keep the discussion on the bug > as I'm not subscribed to -release.] > On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 09:21:34AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > >> But when there is no shared one, the