Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore,
Hõpe to have a bìgger pènis ?
Wè hãve the stùff the pornstãr use to have bìgger
pènis, contrõl their orgãsm and boõst their èrection
Ordèr Hère
http://alaera.com/?xc55059t&banner
So vast is Art, so narrow Human Wit;
With Spirits feeds, wit
Hello,
Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, Qt3.3 is slated for sarge; we're just waiting for it to be in
> sync on all architectures.
Ok, sounds good.
> Is this incompatibility documented in the BTS? Is your package the
> only one affected?
The good news is that the bug was fixe
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:19:18AM -0400, Ryan Golbeck wrote:
> Fix has been uploaded to unstable as 0.5.2-3. Once it has been
> installed I will upload the same version to testing-proposed-updates
> as 0.5.2-2.1 -- if this isn't appropriate, let me know what I should
> do to get this fix into te
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:36:16AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> remove doomlegacy/1.41release-1 doomlegacy-data/1.41release-1
> # RC bugs, licensing issues
> remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2
> # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing
> # we can't provide atm
> remove mind
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 02:56:15AM +0200, Ulrich Scholler wrote:
> we took a shot at this bug and found it to be a bottomless pit. This
> package features missing build depends, missing depends and typos in the
> rules file. In addition to that, it depends on packages that are buggy
> themselves.
Hi,
On Sun Aug 22, 2004 at 11:15:43 +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
> >we took a shot at this bug and found it to be a bottomless pit. This
> >package features missing build depends, missing depends and typos in the
> >rules file. In addition to that, it depends on packages that are buggy
> >themselv
Ulrich et al,
Works for me. The release of sarge has come at a particularly ordinary
time for me (I am on vacation in db.d.o but unfortunately far from it in
reality) and am unable to tend to its problems.
It is however a useful package so I will have it fixed for the next
release (which hop
Hi,
we took a shot at this bug and found it to be a bottomless pit. This
package features missing build depends, missing depends and typos in the
rules file. In addition to that, it depends on packages that are buggy
themselves. We suggest this package to be removed from Sarge.
Regards,
uLI a
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:36:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I recently upload (but before the last call for low urgency uploads) a
> new revision of KSensors that fixes two bugs:
> - A crash when configuring the panels (bug #225712, #265806)
> - Problem in displaying the values (bug#265807).
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 05:04:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Reviewing some QA packages and testing, and I notice that something
> may be wrong with the "lirc" package.
> According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=lirc, lirc
> is waiting on the autobuilders--all of them
Reviewing some QA packages and testing, and I notice that something
may be wrong with the "lirc" package.
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=lirc, lirc
is waiting on the autobuilders--all of them, even the non-overloaded
ones, and therefore is not in testing.
But accordi
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 04:46:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > please remove matchbox/1:0.6.2-1.1 - not fit in opinion of the
> > maintainer, see #265800.
> Actually, the dependencies for matchbox are all going into testing
> to
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:28:21AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> please remove matchbox/1:0.6.2-1.1 - not fit in opinion of the
> maintainer, see #265800.
Actually, the dependencies for matchbox are all going into testing
tomorrow. This bug should probably be closed instead.
Thanks,
--
Steve La
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040822 00:55]:
> remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2
> # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing
> # we can't provide atm
Needs also to remove
jsboard-theme-diary-ko/0.5-1
jsboard-theme-trash-ko/0.5-1
jsboard-theme-aicom-ko/0.5-1
jsboard-the
remove doomlegacy/1.41release-1 doomlegacy-data/1.41release-1
# RC bugs, licensing issues
remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2
# RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing
# we can't provide atm
remove mindterm/1.2.1-10
# See #263362
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
please remove matchbox/1:0.6.2-1.1 - not fit in opinion of the
maintainer, see #265800.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
On 2004-08-21 Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it looks that libiodbc2 arm binaries need to be uploaded. they are
> required for the qt-x11-free build to happen (qt-x11-freeis is Dep-Wait
> on arm because of this).
[...]
The build was not successful, although it seemed to be at fir
Hello
On 2004-08-21 Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> it looks that libiodbc2 arm binaries need to be uploaded. they are
> required for the qt-x11-free build to happen (qt-x11-freeis is Dep-Wait
> on arm because of this).
There was a problem: although the build logs were "maybe-successful" and I saw
n
hi,
it looks that libiodbc2 arm binaries need to be uploaded. they are
required for the qt-x11-free build to happen (qt-x11-freeis is Dep-Wait
on arm because of this).
i know you are all busy people these days...
thanks
domenico
-[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.or
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > question about a removal from testing:
> >
> > openmosix
> >
> > It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
>
> Actually, I was working on that already (well, that issue was fixed, I
> was t
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 12:19:18AM -0400, Ryan Golbeck wrote:
>
> Fix has been uploaded to unstable as 0.5.2-3. Once it has been
> installed I will upload the same version to testing-proposed-updates
> as 0.5.2-2.1 -- if this isn't appropriate, let me know what I should
> do to get this fix into
I've got a couple of packages that I really think ought to make it into
sarge but are not making it there because there seems to be no prospect
of them being built by several of the buildds.
One is NIS, where the current version segfaults running ypxfr on PowerPC
(and possibly other architectures)
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> I plan to upload to testing-proposed-updates a dictionaries-common package
> containing sarge fixes for some bugs. I am explaining each one in a more
> detailed way than will be in the changelog:
> #263402 no default for, "german" o
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Finally, once libmalaga6 finally migrates, libmalaga2 needs to be
> > dropped; nothing depends on it (as I said) and the system should not
> > be bloated with it. The relevant request can be found at bug 264125
> > against ftp.debian.org.
>
> This b
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:46:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> For miscfiles, this is just data (no programs), and the old data is
> very out of date, and actually time-sensitive. I just uploaded today;
> the delay uploading was because the FSF was dithering about whether it
> would make
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:12:08AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> easy moagg/0.13-1 moagg-data/0.13-1
Added.
> easy nvidia-modules-i386/1.0.6111+1 nvidia-graphics-drivers/1.0.6111-1
This one is already done.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 11:11:04PM +0200, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote:
> I think I've asked this before: Can openldap2 be hinted into sarge?
Hint added.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please allow grep 2.5.1.ds1-3 into sarge (or 2.5.1.ds1-2.1 that I
uploaded to testing-proposed-updates, it fixes a policy violation RC
bug (#237071).
-ryan
28 matches
Mail list logo
