Re: Pppconfig_2.3.6 Should Go Into Testing

2004-09-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 05:06:53PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > I have just uploaded pppconfig_2.3.6 to Unstable. It differs from 2.3.5 > only in that it contains additional translations. It is my understanding > that it should, therefor, be pushed into Testing by hand. Reviewed and hinted. Than

Re: please hint tcp-wrappers 7.6.dbs-6 for testing

2004-09-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:29:56PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > tcp-wrappers (7.6.dbs-6) unstable; urgency=medium > * New patch restore_sigalarm correctly restores the SIGALARM handler after > it has been modified by libwrap functions. Extracted from the upstream > package tcp_wrappers_7

Missing/out-of-sync sources in Sarge

2004-09-10 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Hi, The following 13 binary packages in Sarge do not have a corresponding source package in the archive (according to Sources.gz files in the same section, I verified for a few cases that sources are not available at all): main erlang Binary: erlang main erlang

Re: Accepted boost 1.31.0-7 (i386 source all)

2004-09-10 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 05:09:26PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:53:31AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:06:42AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Hi -- out of curiosity, do you know if this is likely to keep boost 1.30 > > > in sarge (and hence

Re: Accepted boost 1.31.0-7 (i386 source all)

2004-09-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:53:31AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:06:42AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi -- out of curiosity, do you know if this is likely to keep boost 1.30 > > in sarge (and hence block kdeedu and regina-normal also)? Or are > > uploads at this lat

Re: Accepted boost 1.31.0-7 (i386 source all)

2004-09-10 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:06:42AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote: > > Hi -- out of curiosity, do you know if this is likely to keep boost 1.30 > in sarge (and hence block kdeedu and regina-normal also)? Or are > uploads at this late stage still expected to move into testing? > hi, given the current

Re: Pppconfig_2.3.6 Should Go Into Testing

2004-09-10 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 07:53:39AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: >> However, the version currently in testing is 2.3.2... > 2.3.5 was uploaded on 31 July: I assumed it would have made it to Testing > by now. base+standard were frozen 2004-08-07, as announced on d-d-a. pppconf

Re: proposed gpm uploads to testing-proposed-updates

2004-09-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi again, On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:36:51PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > The prefered patch is accumulative to the required one. > > Find them on: > > Peter reverted some change that was a bit risky to introduce in the "prefered" patch. I've adde

Re: FTBFS in Sarge (Update)

2004-09-10 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:50:30PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > as i'd like to follow the discussion. Is there any reason > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/09/threads.htm isn't being > updated anymore since yesterday? master.debian.org ran out of diskspace. It will be fixed soon, for

Re: Pppconfig_2.3.6 Should Go Into Testing

2004-09-10 Thread John Hasler
Steve Langasek writes: > However, the version currently in testing is 2.3.2... 2.3.5 was uploaded on 31 July: I assumed it would have made it to Testing by now. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: FTBFS in Sarge (Update)

2004-09-10 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi, as i'd like to follow the discussion. Is there any reason http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/09/threads.htm isn't being updated anymore since yesterday? -- Best regards, Kilian signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: FTBFS in Sarge (Update)

2004-09-10 Thread Andreas Barth
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040910 02:10]: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 01:34:08AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > O.k. I was confused. But there is something I don't understand: > > talksoup_0.0.20032712-3 is still in the archive and on the mirrors > > even though there is a newer vers

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-09-10 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Quoting Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2 > > # see 262925 > > > remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7 > > remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4 > > remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5 > > remove libroxen-

Re: FTBFS in Sarge (Update)

2004-09-10 Thread Christian Perrier
> > > geneweb_4.09-25 > > > WFM, but some warnings > > Same version? There's a new version of geneweb in testing/unstable now. Though untested, I'm confident it will build. FTBFS was the reason for using a new upstream "version" (indeed a CVS snapshot as upstream does not want to release becau

Re: Please let dictionaries-common_0.22.40sarge2 pass to sarge

2004-09-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 03:25:00PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote: > I am about to upload dictionaries-common_0.22.40sarge2 package to > testing-proposed-updates. These are the changelog entries, with some > comments about the second one: > * debian/po: > - Add norwegian nynorsk transla

Re: FTBFS in Sarge (Update)

2004-09-10 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Steve Langasek wrote: [snip] > > > kernel-image-2.4.26-hppa_2.4.26-6 > > > kernel-patch-2.4.25-mips_2.4.25-0.040415.1 > > > kernel-patch-2.4.25-powerpc_2.4.25-8 > > > 2.4.27 is available, removal? > > Not until it's definite that we'll be using 2.4.27 for sarge. 2.4.26-hppa and 2.4.25-powerpc ar