On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 20:10, Steve Langasek wrote:
Why not? I don't see any release-critical bugs open against this
package.
From a release standpoint, packages that don't contain RC bugs are not
regarded as really important. If there is an RC issue with the
existing xmame package,
Hi!
I've built mozilla[1] and mozilla-thunderbird[2] on mipsel after the
latest binutils update, and it finished quite nicely. It looks good, and
I'd like someone to check the build loggs (especially Thieme Seufer) if
the problems they saw previously are still there (from my scan they
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
I've built mozilla[1] and mozilla-thunderbird[2] on mipsel after the
latest binutils update, and it finished quite nicely. It looks good, and
I'd like someone to check the build loggs (especially Thieme Seufer) if
the problems they saw previously are still
I've uploaded a new version of aptitude to unstable that folds in all the
changes from t-p-u, plus a few additional translation updates.
Daniel
--
/ Daniel Burrows [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---\
| I've struggled with reality for thirty-five years,
Forwarding to debian-release.
- Forwarded message from Jacobo Tarrio [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Original-To: debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Bug#272040: Please update for 0.9 or remove
Reply-To: Jacobo Tarrio [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 272040
Hi!
Thanks for Cc, forgot to mention it in my initial mail :-/
* Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-09-17 16:09]:
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
[1] http://alfie.ist.org/debian/mipsel-build/mozilla_1.7.2-4.build
Mozilla uses still the broken xpcom layer, regxpcom will segfault on
6 matches
Mail list logo
