Major income handling Judicial Judgments.
Process from your house from anywhere in the world.
Become your employer.
You decide how much you work.
A substantial number of our members earn 5,000US to 12,000US per mo.
Outstanding customer support and assistance.
http://www.genuineproductvalue.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:50:09AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The problem is that libreadline5 is priority: standard, but should not
> really be targetted for sarge as nothing uses it (except for rlfe), and
> should definitely not have been allowed into sarge at priority: standard
> after th
Several bugfixes have been pulled from Upstream. Please apply.
gnutls11: 1.0.16-7 ==> 1.0.16-9:
+ - Fixed memory leaks.
+ - Fixed a NULL dereference.
+ - Added default limits in the verification of certificate chains,
+ to avoid denial of service attacks.
+ - Added gnutls_certificate_set_verify_
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:23:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sorry for putting you to the extra effort, Marc, it was never
> actually my intention that you upload to t-p-u for this matter. :/
$CURSE
> If there are no objections from the exim4 maintainers, I can push -6
> into testing, and th
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 03:32:15PM -0300, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't finished the installation so I'm just sending this
> message instead of a complete installation report. My testes were done
> with a netinst image downloaded from
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Jérôme,
>
> * Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041014 18:25]:
>> Is it going to make its way into sarge anyway or should I reupload
>> it with a 'medium' urgency?
>
> Please don't re-upload. If sarge is really frozen in the time span where
> this wo
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 07:05:12AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > I plan to upload on sunday.
> > done.
> (exim4 with translation changes and a needed Build-Depends change on
> libgnut
Hi,
two suggestions of me.
# ROM, outdated, #274992
remove python-xml-0.6/0.6.6-3
# RC since long time, #188448
remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Hi Jérôme,
* Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041014 18:25]:
> Is it going to make its way into sarge anyway or should I reupload
> it with a 'medium' urgency?
Please don't re-upload. If sarge is really frozen in the time span where
this would make a difference, we still could consider to let i
(Please CC me)
Hi,
I uploaded a new upstream release of tramp that I'd like to push
into sarge. Unfortunately, I set the urgency of the upload to 'low'
instead of 'medium'.
Is it going to make its way into sarge anyway or should I reupload
it with a 'medium' urgency?
TIA.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme M
The shadow 4.0.3-30.2 release has been uploaded to unstable and is now
autobuild on all arches (the autobuilders rock!).
The changes are either l10n updates or fixes related to D-I preseed
support:
* Non-maintainer upload targeted at sarge.
Localisation and d-i related updates only
* Debc
Quoting Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > I plan to upload on sunday.
>
> done.
(exim4 with translation changes and a needed Build-Depends change on
libgnutls11 instead of libgnutls07)
>From a IRC conversation yesterday with Andrea
12 matches
Mail list logo
