Re: Dropping 386 support

On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 18:35 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:34:50AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > If someone from the kernel or glibc team had access to a real 386, we > > might be able to make (userspace) support work. Would it be possible to > > get access t

openssh 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.2

openssh 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.2 corrects an upgrade bug found by Steve while reviewing 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.1, corrects an interoperability bug triggered by the longer version number, and updates some translations. I'd appreciate it if somebody other than me could review it and push it into testing. open

Re: please push localization-config into testing

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:28:12AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: >version 0.102 of localization-config (in testing now) has a grave > bug (#277362) which was noted by Joey Hess. I have fixed that in > 0.105 which was just accepted in unstable but will remain there for 2 > more days.

Re: Please consider newt for sarge

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:13:21PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Please consider the latest newt (current sid version) for sarge, once > it builds on all archs. > > It contains translations for 3 more languages > [no other changes]. Done. Cheers, -- Colin Watson

Re: Dropping 386 support

Am 2004-10-22 11:34:50, schrieb Andres Salomon: > If someone from the kernel or glibc team had access to a real 386, we > might be able to make (userspace) support work. Would it be possible to > get access to this machine? Need a i80386 Mainboard ? I have one runing NetBSD :-) with 4 MB of mem

[VAC] Oct 24-26

hi, I have had to go down the country on personal business, away from my pc, and am not in a position to fix bugs. Usual rules on NMUs apply. Regards Alastair McKinstry

Re: 4.34-4sarge3 uploaded (was: Exim4 upload?)

Quoting Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > * Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041023 09:10]: > > If I don't get news from Marc or Andreas during this week-end, I > > upload to unstable (as the changes are made against unstable and no > > change needs to be kept in testing only). > > Andrea

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update [Oct 24]

Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update == An up-to-date version is at . I am sorry for not being able to send out the entire document, though, but the preparation efforts list has grown so m

Re: removal suggestion: stars

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:00:17 +0200, Tobias Stefan Richter wrote: > I am also confident that the maintain will solve this issue in the near > future, but I still fail to see a reason to keep the broken, policy > violating version in sarge. Reason: Removing the package involves work. Work that d