Re: m68k gcc-3.3 __fixunsdfdi problem (Re: Bug#278135: gawk: FTBFS on m68k: clobber.awk test fails with "internal error")

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Klose
there is a workaround (gcc-3.2), therefore the severity could be reduced, otoh it's generating wrong code. please could you check, if this one is reproducible in gcc-3.4? The last awk sucessfully built on m68k is the 3.3 branch 20040728. Matthias Fumitoshi UKAI writes: > clone 278135 -

Re: Please don't release schoolbell

2004-10-26 Thread Andreas Barth
* Brian Sutherland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041026 22:55]: > I have filed bug 278411 against schoolbell, one of the packages I > maintain. > > For the reason in the bugreport, I don't think it should be released > with sarge. (Sorry for allowing it through, but I only found out about > the issue today

Please don't release schoolbell

2004-10-26 Thread Brian Sutherland
I have filed bug 278411 against schoolbell, one of the packages I maintain. For the reason in the bugreport, I don't think it should be released with sarge. (Sorry for allowing it through, but I only found out about the issue today) P.S. Please CC me as I am not subscribed. -- Brian Sutherland

m68k gcc-3.3 __fixunsdfdi problem (Re: Bug#278135: gawk: FTBFS on m68k: clobber.awk test fails with "internal error")

2004-10-26 Thread Fumitoshi UKAI
clone 278135 -1 reassign -1 gcc-3.3 retitle -1 gcc-3.3: __fixunsdfdi problem on m68k severity -1 critical retitle 278135 gawk: FTBFS on m68k: clobber.awk test fails with "internal error" with gcc-3.3 thanks I confirm RC Bug#278135 on crest.debian.org's dchroot unstable, so I track down it with he

Re: testing-proposed-updates security fix for koffice

2004-10-26 Thread Andreas Barth
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041026 16:25]: > Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:14:10PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > > > Hi, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > > The fixed package version will be 1:1.3.2-1.sarge.2 > > > > > > > > That's a version

Re: testing-proposed-updates security fix for koffice

2004-10-26 Thread Martin Schulze
Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:14:10PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > > Hi, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > The fixed package version will be 1:1.3.2-1.sarge.2 > > > > > > That's a version number which looks like a binary NMU, which AFAIK causes > > > prob

Re: testing-proposed-updates security fix for koffice

2004-10-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:14:10PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > Hi, Ben Burton wrote: > > > The fixed package version will be 1:1.3.2-1.sarge.2 > > > > That's a version number which looks like a binary NMU, which AFAIK causes > > problems. > > We would use 1:1.3.2-1s

Re: testing-proposed-updates security fix for koffice

2004-10-26 Thread Martin Schulze
Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Ben Burton wrote: > > > The fixed package version will be 1:1.3.2-1.sarge.2 > > That's a version number which looks like a binary NMU, which AFAIK causes > problems. We would use 1:1.3.2-1sarge2 for a security update, but either should be fine. Matthias, where woul

Re: testing-proposed-updates security fix for koffice

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Ben Burton wrote: > The fixed package version will be 1:1.3.2-1.sarge.2 That's a version number which looks like a binary NMU, which AFAIK causes problems. IMHO you should lose at least one of the dots. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]