Does xmmplayer need a hint? It is in contrib and seems to
be blocked because mplayer isn't part of Debian. Packages
in contrib are allowed to have unsatisfiable dependencies,
right?
Thanks,
--Andre
Do it!
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:51 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hello release team,
>
> The GNOME team have been talking about what the chances are of having
> GNOME 2.8 uploaded to unstable since it was released upstream early in
> September.
>
> While two months ago we never consider this to
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:54:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> There is no mips buildd for testing-proposed-updates, which is one
> of the problems with this bypass...
Is the problem that a machine does not exist to be a buildd for
t-p-u, or that one has not been set up yet?
--
gram
Hi,
I think it would be good to have prebuilt i2c and lm-sensors modules
included in Sarge so the users with a 2.4 kernel doesn't have to build
anything before reading their motherboard's sensors.
However the packages are currently stucked in Sid by bugs #270481 and
#270482 that I can't solv
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 10:51 +0100, Jordi Mallach wrote:
>
> Debian users _are_ using GNOME 2.8, and while it's available in
> experimental, it's a pain for them as there's no optimal way of
> maintaining an up to date GNOME 2.8 dekstop easily unless completely
> upgrading to experimental.
I mostl
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:26:33AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
>> Greetings! The alpha structure for this package has changed: ev5
>> -> ev6. This is correct. Could someone please facilitate migration
>> into testing?
>
> This needs ftpmaster attention
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:26:33AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings! The alpha structure for this package has changed: ev5
> -> ev6. This is correct. Could someone please facilitate migration
> into testing?
This needs ftpmaster attention (which should be semi-automatic) to have
the old b
Greetings! The alpha structure for this package has changed: ev5
-> ev6. This is correct. Could someone please facilitate migration
into testing?
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ Small suggestion ahead ]
Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Debian users _are_ using GNOME 2.8, and while it's available in
> experimental, it's a pain for them as there's no optimal way of
> maintaining an up to date GNOME 2.8 dekstop easily unless completely
> upgrading to experimental.
A Componentized e
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> openssh 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.2 corrects an upgrade bug found by Steve while
> reviewing 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.1, corrects an interoperability bug
> triggered by the longer version number, and updates some translations.
> I'd appreciate it if
Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]:
> > > I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that
> > > is the general consent.
> >
> > If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters
> > (an
Hallo,
Ich habe bereits einige Debian Packete erstellt, von AVM (Kisdnwatch, Kadslwatch etc.),
die dazugehörigen Kernel Module von AVM mit dem Kernel 2.6.9 werden auch bald folgen.
Das ganze für unstable mit KDE 3.3.1.
Was muss ich machen, um diese auch in unstable mit zu veröffentlichen, oder m
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]:
> > I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that
> > is the general consent.
>
> If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters
> (and I guess, an upload is not required
* Jay Berkenbilt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041110 02:25]:
> Please remove vips7.8 and nip from sarge. vips 7.10 and nip2 have
> been released, and after discussion with upstream, we have decided not
> to include the older versions in sarge. I have uploaded (through a
> sponsor) vips7.10 and nip2 and a
Hello release team,
The GNOME team have been talking about what the chances are of having
GNOME 2.8 uploaded to unstable since it was released upstream early in
September.
While two months ago we never consider this to be a real possibility for
various reasons (Sarge was going to freeze real soon
* Karsten Merker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041109 19:35]:
> I can change the priority to optional and re-upload the package, if that
> is the general consent.
If the priority is changed, than it needs to be done by the ftp-masters
(and I guess, an upload is not required). The bad news is that AFAICS
t
Robin wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have a question about the t-p-u build queue; one of my packages (kvirc) is
> trying to make it into testing by way of t-p-u and right now it's only
> waiting to be built on mips before that can happen.
> Should I ask a MIPS buildd maintainer to schedule a t-p-u bu
17 matches
Mail list logo
