arvis&marilyn butler pmb 117
1785 ocean blvd coos bay,or 97420 changeto; arvis & marlin
butler 1800 28th court coos bay or 97420
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> The GNOME team have been talking about what the chances are of having
> GNOME 2.8 uploaded to unstable since it was released upstream early in
> September.
>
> While two months ago we never consider this to be a real possibility for
> various reasons, t
Joey Hess wrote:
> fdisk-udeb
> Like its source util-linux, this has a different version for
> s390 in unstable and testing than any other arch.
Correction, util-linux is in sync. The fdisk-udeb situtation is that
it's no longer built for s390, so should be removed from unstable and
te
Some udebs have a newer version in sarge from their source package. This
is a leftover from the bad old days when I didn't check source versions
of udebs whose source didn't build debs; I'm more careful now. The
significant ones are:
colo-udeb 1.14-1 vs colo 1.10-1
colo is frozen
t
Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:54:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > There is no mips buildd for testing-proposed-updates, which is one
> > of the problems with this bypass...
>
> Is the problem that a machine does not exist to be a buildd for
> t-p-u, or that one has not bee
Guys, we can't let the Germans and Australians have all the fun! Let's
get together in Cambridge and show them how to close those bugs.
If we all pull together, we can get the RC bugs killed and help make
sarge a great (if late) release. Everyone's welcome to join us in
person, and we'll be active
ftp-master has downgraded delo's priority, and I have removed it from
Packages-arch-specific. That should make all parties happy. Enjoy.
... Adam
* Johannes Rohr
| Three of those packages can be easily brought up-to-date within five
| minutes: Please download the latest langpack from ftp.mozilla.org and
| rebuild your package. Here are the URLs:
No, they can not. I've run into problems getting the nb_NO version to
work properly.
If the
Hello,
exim4 4.34-7 is up to date on all architectures and closes all l10n
related bugs.
There'll soon be a -8, which also is targeted for sarge via sid,
however its changes will be a *little* bit more interesting, therefore
I'll want -8 to simmer a little bit longer in sid and would like the
"tri
Talking with some debian mips people it looks like the mips{,el}
problems about GOT handling are not resolved in the sarge time frame.
You can work around them by building a glibc-got-static libc6 (see
#274738), but nobody wants to put in the resources for this task. The
only package currently dire
10 matches
Mail list logo
