On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 11:27:05AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> --
> findutils (4.1.20-5) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Chuan-kai Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has offered to serve as backup
> maintainer. Thanks. Add him to Uploaders.
>* xargs now works even if the en
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:56:30PM -0700, Aaron Read wrote:
> I believe smlnj is not entering testing because of a circular
> dependency (smlnj has itself as a build dependency) if I understand
> this correctly:
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=smlnj
No, circular dependencies are
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:19:43PM +0100, Joerg Friedrich wrote:
> after reading the latest Release Update from Andreas I wonder what will
> happen with this issue I reported last week?
> ATM installing installation of a simple Desktopenvironment will fail on
> all architectures exept for i386 and
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:59:03PM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:21:25PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Getting testing-security up and running is blocking on a couple of
> > changes to the archive configuration. Security uploads are first
> > uploaded to their own arch
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:21:25PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Getting testing-security up and running is blocking on a couple of
> changes to the archive configuration. Security uploads are first
> uploaded to their own archive while the security announcement is in
> preparation, and later (via
Hi again,
after reading the latest Release Update from Andreas I wonder what will
happen with this issue I reported last week?
ATM installing installation of a simple Desktopenvironment will fail on
all architectures exept for i386 and powerpc. Reason:
Sourcepackage: kdegraphics
the binary packa
I believe smlnj is not entering testing because of a circular
dependency (smlnj has itself as a build dependency) if I understand
this correctly:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=smlnj
There is also a sml-nj package that needs to be removed from testing
at the same time. I don't kn
* Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041130 16:50]:
> Is there anything the release managers are able and willing to do in order to
> help some contrib packages with missing dependencies into sarge? There are
> several packages that have java dependencies that seemingly cannot be
> resolved
Is there anything the release managers are able and willing to do in order to
help some contrib packages with missing dependencies into sarge? There are
several packages that have java dependencies that seemingly cannot be
resolved without some sort of hammer. A sizeable list of possible candi
Hi Matthew,
On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Well, IIRC, it is enough to use _only_ the 32bit kernel, and that would
> > make it easier for us, because we don't need an extra package in the
> > archive. But yes, your reason is
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Well, IIRC, it is enough to use _only_ the 32bit kernel, and that would
> make it easier for us, because we don't need an extra package in the
> archive. But yes, your reason is also strong. Ok, so I tend to go to the
> backported mod
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041130 14:15]:
> On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote:
> > What would be the issue with installing an 32bit-kernel for
> > dist-upgrades? (If this is a silly idea, please tell me.)
>
> i did not test it. should i?
>
> I also don't think it's a good idea to
Hi Andreas,
On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some more questions:
>
> What would be the issue with installing an 32bit-kernel for
> dist-upgrades? (If this is a silly idea, please tell me.)
i did not test it. should i?
I also don't think it's a good idea to install a 32bit-kernel.
Hi,
some more questions:
What would be the issue with installing an 32bit-kernel for
dist-upgrades? (If this is a silly idea, please tell me.)
Also, which version of modutils was used?
Thanks for your work,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 4
14 matches
Mail list logo
