Please approve openldap2 2.1.30-8 for sarge. I previously approved
2.1.30-7, but then I went and did the -8 upload myself, so it's probably
better if someone else reviews that diff :)
Fixes RC bug #309485 (relative to -7), and RC bug #306258 (already fixed in
-7).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
post
#include
Please consider accepting module-assistant 0.9 in Sarge. It mostly
contains cosmetic fixes (manpage updates, new translation) and trivial
changes for things that would beginn to bother me some months later,
when Sarge is Stable. Changes attached below.
Regards,
Eduard.
module-assistant
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:32:33AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I just uploaded gmailfs 0.4, which fixes #309259. It is a new
> upstream version, but Sebastian, the maintainer, verified each line
> of the diff and we were able to conclude that 0.4 fixes the RC bug
> but does not add anything els
Viagra: save more buying more
http://sdfnLgi.amb5.com/p/sevy/attain.htm
Jefferson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 03:11:22AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Sjoerd,
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> > I've just uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.8.4-4. Which fixes gnome bug 303470[0].
> > The
> > result of this bug is that when gnome-vfs is used to copy dir
Hi, I've should have done this before but I wanted to make sure they
are pretty on good shape and uploaded before request inclusion.
lletters: has one important fix on usability (#290680), and some other
improvements that I'd like people to enjoy, hereby I request its
inclusion on sarge.
torcs: t
hey steve,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 07:21:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, unpacking the two versions and applying the diffs still gives me 100
> lines of changes to upstream code that don't seem to be documented in the
> changelog, though perhaps this is what's referred to as "import of u
Version 2-unofficial-mt.10-1 of rng-tools fixes one critical usability bug,
which causes rng-tools to *not* work out-of-the-box. It has other important
documentation updates which will make my life that much easier when etch
comes. See #308248.
Please allow it to propagate from unstable to sarg
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:03:15AM +0300, Radu Spineanu wrote:
> These three packages contain only translation updates.
> Please consider them for sarge.
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
Today I did a upload fixing a FTBFS bug on it. Upstream did a small
group of bugfixes and all those are very interesting to have included
on sarge so I think is good to have it there.
Following was the fixes did by upstream:
,[ changelog.Ubuntu ]
| xresprobe (0.4.18) hoary; urgency=lo
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:01:09 +0200
> Source: gwrapguile
> Binary: libgwrapguile-dev libgwrapguile1
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1.3.4-13
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: high
> Maintainer: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changed-By: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PR
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 03:29:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Please review this t-p-u upload..
Approved.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 02:57:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Format: 1.7
> > > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 09:56:22 -0700
> > > Source: python-libgmail
> > > Binary: python-libgmail
> > > Architecture: source all
> > > Versio
Someone please review this security fix for sarge.
(Also, just a reminder that my upload of gaim for some seurity issues
still needs a review.)
- Forwarded message from Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:02:04 -0400
To: debian-de
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:38:27AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:53:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Mmm, as correct as that might be in principle, I'm afraid that looks like
> > too large of a change to make to the package at this late date.
> while interdiff may loo
Hi Steve,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 06:37:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:31:56PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote:
> > (Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
>
> > I've also prepared a scim-chinese 0.4.2-3 package, which fixes a FTBFS
> > bug wi
Hi Ming,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:31:56PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote:
> (Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
> I've also prepared a scim-chinese 0.4.2-3 package, which fixes a FTBFS
> bug with gcc-4.0.
> I am not sure if this upload is going to be approved for sarge,
> especial
Dear release managers,
(Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
I've also prepared a scim-chinese 0.4.2-3 package, which fixes a FTBFS
bug with gcc-4.0.
I am not sure if this upload is going to be approved for sarge,
especially since Steve talked about gcc-4.0 bugs are not relea
Dear release managers,
(Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
I am planning to (have my sponsor) upload scim 1.0.2-3, which is mostly a
documentation update, and adjusted dependency a little. My regular
sponsor, Osamu Aoki is moving from Europe to Japan and can't sponsor
this
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:17:36PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > You did email us, and I sent back this reply commenting on your postinst
> > changes; perhaps you didn't receive it:
> Sorry, seem to have missed that email.
> > Hmm, unfortunately this means that anyone who has fiddled any of
Hello,
Upstream of scmxx has made me aware of a quite severe bug on non-i386
arches:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:54:13AM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> I was made aware of a problem on PPC (reproduced on Sparc32) of SMS decoding
> problems (does not happen with my i686 based system).
> It proble
tag 248146 fixed
tag 299385 fixed
tag 171742 fixed
tag 188970 fixed
tag 236924 fixed
tag 263933 fixed
tag 280858 fixed
tag 280862 fixed
thanks
Back when the freeze wa announced, I was talking to aba and he suggested
that it might still be possible for a fixed docbook-xsl package to enter
sarge.
Hello Release Team,
I have NMUed openscenegraph 0.9.8-4.1 to fix a (slightly more than)
potential FTBFS on the buildd. Patch and comment are in bug #303896.
openscenegraph is up-to-date on all architectures.
Would you approve it for sarge ?
Once it is in sarge, could you approve libjpeg6b-10 as
Hi,
I'd like to ask you for considering the following packages for sarge:
afterstep 2.00.04-3 ---> 2.00.04-4
---
Contains patch prepared by the upstream author to fix some segfaults
and a few other problems. When reviewing the patch, you can ignore
the LOCAL_DEB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16-05-2005 22:06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:03:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>> * libgd-noxpm-perl (built from exact same source) is in sarge.
>
>
> Eh, why aren't both packages actually built from the same
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:19:51PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 16-05-2005 22:06, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 07:03:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >
> >> * libgd-noxpm-perl (built from exact same source
Hi,
Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I realize ahead of time that the answer is likely no, and I fully
> understand the reasons behind that. Nevertheless, I promised to ask, so
> here goes:
>
> Since version 0.84 of clamav made it into sarge, upstream has (again)
> done some work on the sca
Hello all,
I realize ahead of time that the answer is likely no, and I fully
understand the reasons behind that. Nevertheless, I promised to ask, so
here goes:
Since version 0.84 of clamav made it into sarge, upstream has (again)
done some work on the scanning engine, which means that certain
si
> You did email us, and I sent back this reply commenting on your postinst
> changes; perhaps you didn't receive it:
Sorry, seem to have missed that email.
>
> Hmm, unfortunately this means that anyone who has fiddled any of the
> startup symlinks for *other* runlevels is going to lose config
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> I added some checks to the latest patch (attached) where I split patu into
> the buffers for the directory part and the filename part again. After that
> point the buffers are all big enough to hold the strings.
The new version of the patch looks acceptable to me.
--
see
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Thomas Schoepf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Kopie: debian-release@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: Please accept unzoo into sarge
> Datum: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:37:09 -0400
> Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> +
Hi Michael,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:48:58PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I just learned that I managed to not send an email to you guys when I
> uploaded a new version of watchdog fixing the bug the caused its removal
> from sarge and another small one.
You did email us, and I sent back th
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> I've uploaded an update to version 4.4-2 of unzoo which is already in sarge
> that fixes the recently discovered directory traversal bug.
>
> My patch can be found in Bugreport #306164 (
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306164 ). The patch has
> been sent
Hi,
I just learned that I managed to not send an email to you guys when I
uploaded a new version of watchdog fixing the bug the caused its removal
from sarge and another small one.
So here we go. The patch between 5.2.4-2 and 5.2.4-3 is attached, so you
can review it.
Hopefully you can put wat
Hi Alexey,
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 08:46:30PM +0400, Alexey Nezhdanov wrote:
> Satturday, 14 May 2005 11:31 Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello.
> I have corrected list of bugfixes: some were gone as insignigicant, other
> were
> upgraded :)
> Really, most of these bug are really serious enough. They
package gaim
tags 309435 + pending
thanks
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote, Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:57 AM
> This is just a reminder that there are known vulnerabilities in
> gaim 1.2.1 in sarge that need to be fixed in the release process
> either through t-p-u or by allowing 1.3.0 in to sarg
Hi,
I've uploaded an update to version 4.4-2 of unzoo which is already in sarge
that fixes the recently discovered directory traversal bug.
My patch can be found in Bugreport #306164 (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306164 ). The patch has
been sent to the bts about half an hour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Please approve the just uploaded tclx8.3 NMU in sarge.
Cheers
Luk
PS: Just noted a typo in the changelog, it has to be version 8.3.0-8 of
course (it is correct in debian/control though).
PS2: 8.3.0-8 is the version in woody, as I don't know a fa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Please approve this new version (in t-p-u) of pcre3 in testing.
Cheers
Luk
PS: I think remembrance-agent dropped the file in 2.11-5 looking at the
changelog.
Luk Claes wrote:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:51:24 +0200
> Source: pcre3
Hi,
I know, sarge is frozen, but I have 2 packages to upload in sarge.
The first is important, it's amule, a p2p client which is very used. The
last version has been released and I packaged it and fix all RC bugs. It
compiles now on powerpc (I compiled it on my iBook). So, it could be
great if am
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:42:11PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I was told that gnupg might be updated for sarge with the version from
> unstable. Please be aware that the gnupg version has changed some of its
> locale strings on which t-prot depends for doing its work.
> That means that you a
Hi!
I was told that gnupg might be updated for sarge with the version from
unstable. Please be aware that the gnupg version has changed some of its
locale strings on which t-prot depends for doing its work.
That means that you are strongly encouraged to update t-prot along with
gnupg. T
Hi,
I've uploaded an update to version 4.4-2 of unzoo which is already in sarge
that fixes the recently discovered directory traversal bug.
My patch can be found in Bugreport #306164 (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306164 ). The patch has
been sent to the bts about half an hour
hi,
apcupsd has been uploaded in unstable on 03/04/05.
However due to arm queue (?) it has not been inserted on sarge.
Please consider to insert version 3.10.17-2 on sarge because
it fix some problems and it's well updated (support for USB APC
is going well) .
Apcupsd is a daemon that communicate w
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:45:02PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 01:03:26PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Changelog:
> > muddleftpd (1.3.13.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> > * Change libmysqlclient-dev to libmysqlclient12-dev
>
> Why not libmysqlclient14 ?
After
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:34:46AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:15:35AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >
> > I have (temporarily) disabled all translations except for EN, FR and NL in
> > order not to confuse users who want to test upgrades using the Releas
Hi Debian developpers,
I just read the mail by Steve Langasek on Debian devel-announce.
His remark concerning the processing of upgrade reports drew my attention.
I would be happy to spend a little of my spare-time to help out in this matter.
I have been using Debian SID for over 3.5 years and I
Hi,
Please approve mdbtools 0.5.99.0.6pre1.0.20050409-1 to be included for
sarge again. It fixes the compilation bug which prompted removal, and has
been >12 days in sid now since it got uploaded with no problems reported.
Regards,
Filip
--
"Students who successfully accomplish this task will
48 matches
Mail list logo
