Hi Mattia,
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It
fixes 3
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
It sounds ok to upload, but I make no promises about it getting in before
seeing the code. :)
I have just uploaded a new version to testing-proposed-update. Please
find the changes between the current version in Sarge and this new one
below.
Oops, I probably missed
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Append the GCC version to the fastjar/grepjar version string.
Closes: #296567.
This is a severity: minor bug.
* On powerpc, configure using --enable-targets to build a biarch compiler.
Disabled by default.
* Fixed java build for
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
please allow mutt 1.5.9-2 into sarge, it fixes an RC bug (FTBFS) and
contains a translation update.
Changelog entry follows, thanks.
mutt (1.5.9-2) unstable; urgency=high
* Added a missing Build-Depend on mawk.
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
Il giorno lun, 23/05/2005 alle 01.57 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld ha
scritto:
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:42:30AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
I need to upload a new orig.tar.gz and don't know how to do that for
sarge.
You
On 5/23/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mattia,
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
A snippet from changes file
,---
| Closes: 310147 310149
| Changes:
| cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
| .
|
package: fai
version: 2.8.3
Hi,
On Sunday 22 May 2005 16:34, Frans Pop wrote:
Hrm. s/there is a chance// *IMO*. It is 100% sure it will be shut
down, either for r0 directly, or with empty package files for a time
(until r1 or etch).
No package file will cause fai-setup (and
Dear Release Team,
please consider updating synaptic for debian/sarge. The version in
unstable adds a update to the brasilian translation and fixes the
problem that there are two desktop files for synaptic in gnome (of
which one is not working). No code changes otherwise.
Thanks,
Michael
--
On Mon, 23 May 2005 12:03:31 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
please consider updating synaptic for debian/sarge. The version in
unstable adds a update to the brasilian translation and fixes the
I'd be plsd if you don't forget to add the updated Bulgarian translation,
which has some major updates
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 12:22:43AM +0200, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
I uploaded a new revision of somaplayer which fixes #309093 (RC) and
#297963 (FTBFS on amd64).
I simply sponsored this upload, the actual work was done by the
maintainer, Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Please CC: him on
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:19:36AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:52:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
I'm proposing the following updates for gcc-3.3 for testing:
gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-13) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
Please approve for sarge. Note that kdelibs has an unversioned
dependency on libmad0 now because of the broken shlibs of the newest
version of that package. I don't know how serious we want to take
that issue.
- Forwarded message from Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Frank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear,
I NMUed xlockmore 1:5.13-2.1 to fix RC #309760.
I checked Eugene's patch solved this bug.
Could you accept this for Sarge?
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:30:18 +
Source: xlockmore
Binary: xlockmore xlockmore-gl
Architecture: source
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 01:26:59AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
* src/translator_ca.h: Revert accidental conversion to unicode.
Patch by Maximiliano Pin (closes: #309913).
the patch can be found in the bug report. The encoding was correct in
1.4.1 and is corrected in 1.4.3. Although one
tag 310389 sarge
thanks
Jefferson Cowart wrote:
Upgrading from the woody version of analog to the version in sarge
fails:
# aptitude install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:23:15AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
tag 310389 sarge
thanks
Jefferson Cowart wrote:
Upgrading from the woody version of analog to the version in sarge
fails:
# aptitude install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree
Reading extended state
Horms,
Here's FreeRADIUS 1.0.2-4 for sponsorship. It's a set of security fixes
SQL driver, one a two-byte buffer overflow, and one an SQL injection
attack.
I've already discussed this on debian-release, although I am CCing this
there in case the release team feels that only the SQL injection
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll send an email to the list expressing your concerns.
Sent the email and fixed the subject of this thread. ;-)
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
--
To
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 05:38:14PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.release, Steve Langasek wrote:
I've just uploaded binutils 2.15-6 to unstable. This fixes #308625,
an RC security bug. The only change from 2.15-5 (in testing and
unstable) is:
Please
tags 310254 sarge
thanks
I am uploading this to unstable now. The only change to the package
is the translation. Please consider it for sarge.
--
Chad Walstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:20:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Mattia,
[...]
A snippet from changes file
,---
| Closes: 310147 310149
| Changes:
| cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high
| .
|* Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes:
Hi!
Before you are worried about a new cdbs regression causing automake
build-dependencies to be generated wrong (automake-1.x instead of automake1.x),
causing a number of new FTBFSes, this is being fixed in .30 (it was introduced
in .29).
Sorry again for the hassle.
--
.''`. Proudly
adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1 fixes #310246 and should be in incoming now.
Build works in pbuilder. Please accept it.
adduser-ng (0.1.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Urgency high to target sarge release as this fixes an RC bug.
* Applied patch by Roger Leigh [EMAIL
Moi!
I've uploaded two late arrivals of new debconf translations for muse and
noflushd. I hope they are not too late for sarge. No further changes
have been made to the packages; they are current on all archs and would
be valid candidates by tomorrow's britney run. Please approve.
Thanks,
Previously mentioned fix for important severity bug.
- Forwarded message from Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:17:03 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Accepted analog 2:5.32-14 (i386 source)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi all,
Does anybody want to test the current openswan 1:2.2.0-7 packages at
http://www.gibraltar.at/~rene/openswan/
or should I upload to unstable? If nobody can give it a try, I intent to
upload tomorrow morning (GMT+2).
with best regards,
Rene
pgp3UvPKK5k5I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
exim4 4.50-6 is now 32 days old. It has been uploaded well before the
base-freeze morphed to the full freeze, and would have propagated to
testing on April 27, a week before the full freeze was allowed, if it
had not been prematurely been frozen over a year ago on March 29, 2004.
To take
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.23.2233 +0200]:
Why don't you generate the html-nochunks documentation anymore?
No particular reason except that Roger's patch did not do so?
Anyway, nochunks is really
I am not sure what the status is on non-free packages, but libcwd
has really not been treated nicely:
220 days old (needed 10 days)
I have requested it to be built several times and for architectures
to be masked (or whatever that was called), but have been ignored
apparently.
Since non-free
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.23.2245 +0200]:
No particular reason except that Roger's patch did not do so?
Anyway, nochunks is really just a convenience thing (single page, as
opposed to multiple page), so does it really matter? I give you that
maybe nochunks would
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:01:08PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I am not sure what the status is on non-free packages, but libcwd
has really not been treated nicely:
220 days old (needed 10 days)
I have requested it to be built several times and for architectures
to be masked (or
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:12:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.23.2245 +0200]:
No particular reason except that Roger's patch did not do so?
Anyway, nochunks is really just a convenience thing (single page, as
opposed to multiple
Glibc -22 has finally been built and uploaded for all architectures
(special thanks to Ryan for kicking it along). Every change in the
package should be suitable for sarge; it fixes one bug, which is not
tagged as RC, but various RMs have agreed is important to fix.
* Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL
also sprach Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.05.23.2325 +0200]:
You can either file a bug against ftp.debian.org and request removal
of the other architectures or build them yourself (looks easily
buildable on the debian.org machines because of the light build depends).
I did request
Hi,
I just uploaded an NMU for viewcvs that fixes #303756.
It's in incoming right now.
The problem was an out of date template that made viewcvs print
backtraces when viewing the history of cvs files.
The fix is using a newer template (from upstream CVS) which has 3 lines
removed.
It would be
mdadm has a udeb and is needed for installation. I just ran a quick
install check:
01:32 madduck i started a new install, replaced the mdadm-udeb with the new
one on tty2 before configuring the raids
01:32 madduck then installed the base system with /home being raided
01:32
On Sunday 22 May 2005 20:56, Bill Allombert wrote:
The upgrade reports show that users tend to upgrade the kernel from 2.4
to 2.6 at the same time they upgrade to sarge, so it could be
worthwhile to include a note to help them:
I have created a quite extensive section [1] on upgrading to a 2.6
It is a *serious policy violation*. I've been talking with the
ftpparse lists and it turns out that there is a replacement in the
program ftpcopy (search google). I haven't verified it though. Here's
my analysis of the problems:
* Commercial use requires contacting author (no specific DFSG
On Monday 23 May 2005 01:02, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Attached is a patch in order to introduce some information in the
Release Nots on how to detect obsolete packages after an upgrade. The
patch is actually made up of two parts:
- a section right after the upgrade that details
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:25:12PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
This bug has been fixed in an NMU I uploaded a short while ago. The
final diff is as detailed below.
The changes are the same as in Torsten's last patch, but I've
corrected the problems with the discrepancies between debian/control
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:17:14AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2005 01:02, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
Attached is a patch in order to introduce some information in the
Release Nots on how to detect obsolete packages after an upgrade. The
patch is actually made up of
41 matches
Mail list logo
