Hmm, it is a *bit* late, but would it be possible to allow httrack 3.33.16-1 to
enter testing ?
A serious bug was reported 30/05, that causes excessive bandwidth consumption,
when mirroring certain sites in commandline mode, if no monitoring of the
download is made. After few days of
Hi Xavier,
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 09:45:52AM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
Hmm, it is a *bit* late, but would it be possible to allow httrack
3.33.16-1 to enter testing ?
A serious bug was reported 30/05, that causes excessive bandwidth
consumption, when mirroring certain sites in commandline
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 02:36:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Sorry, the archive has already been locked down for CD mastering and symlink
changes for the sarge release.
I'm not sure why excessive bandwidth consumption would be RC, in any case;
does this actually mean consumes all available
Hi all,
in order to make the sarge announcement translated, I would like to know
if there is already a english draft (on CVS?) that we may start working
on.
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 05 June 2005 12:50, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Hi all,
in order to make the sarge announcement translated, I would like to know
if there is already a english draft (on CVS?) that we may start working
on.
Giuseppe
Hi,
quoting Joey [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday 05
hi
I have uploaded to unstable a new gpr
namely gpr_0.9deb-5b
it contains two more translations of debconf template
it has not yet been autobuilded
if it is autobuilt succesfully, and
if there is time left (and I think that this means, if the release
is postponed), please accept it into
www.cjgrfbcig5u19vc.impynjimpy9.com
cerclasse du du fauchés, de. rappliquent chiqueraient apostrophera mais
arpentant sans vers discursive du durcisseur.
de mien devant mécompte de encastreriez palabrassent sur cela politiserons
raller les assourdirez.
mais liraient de au-dessus énoncés les
[Mantas Kriau??i??nas]
I just wonder why Debian Sarge is going to be relesed with old, outdated
discover1-data package, while in unstable exist up to date package which
detects more hardware, for example more populiar video cards from NVIDIA
and ATI.
Please allow updating discover1-data
On 10311 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Cc to debian-release, to pledge that the release managers include
version 1.2005.04.23 of discover1-data in Sarge.
Sarge is closed, so you are out of luck.
-- Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:36:07 -0700
That old, and now
I uploaded tinyhoneypot (0.4.6-8) May 11th to fix a serious bug (adduser
was not present in the dependencies) but failed to ask -release to approve
this into sarge.
This serious bug has been recently reported as #312021. If possible,
please approve the latest version of tinyhoneypot into sarge.
[Joerg Jaspert]
Sarge is closed, so you are out of luck.
Actually, the users with that hardware is out of luck. I'm happy, as
I got hardware already handled by discover1-data in sarge.
Oh, well. To bad. Somebody elses problem, I guess.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
'ello Petter
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Joerg Jaspert]
Sarge is closed, so you are out of luck.
Actually, the users with that hardware is out of luck. I'm happy, as
I got hardware already handled by discover1-data in sarge.
Oh, well. To bad.
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:32:59PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I uploaded tinyhoneypot (0.4.6-8) May 11th to fix a serious bug (adduser
was not present in the dependencies) but failed to ask -release to approve
this into sarge.
This serious bug has been recently reported as
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 05:22:38PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Mantas Kriau??i??nas]
I just wonder why Debian Sarge is going to be relesed with old, outdated
discover1-data package, while in unstable exist up to date package which
detects more hardware, for example more populiar
14 matches
Mail list logo
